Paul markham infringing on crak revenue
Collapse
X
-
So, you accuse me of a crime with no proof and then lie when you realise you are wrong and you know it's a lie and I didn't do it.So, you accuse me of a crime with no proof and then laugh when you realise you are wrong and I was nothing to do with it? I
And instead of manning up you cry like a bitch about Markham?
Wow.
Sadder than I thought.
And instead of manning up you cry like a bitch.
Wow.
Stupider than I thought.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Hahaha YES, denying it 100% (I am not a crook!) - "everyone knows" - what unbelievable BS you come up with.
So you get all pussy-hurt and start pissing and moaning when you think I accuse you of something you didn't do, then you go and accuse me of something false?!? You can't have it both ways, DamianJ, now it's obvious that you're a lying hypocriteComment
-
so start a thread to defend yourself.
As far as I see you seem to live for boards trouble.
I want you out of my threads, they accused you as a joke .. Its obvious for everybody, and
and you just keep going at it, with way worst accusation.
I can confirm its not you.
So move on.
thanks.Comment
-
Comment
-
Why are you in this thread? If you know who owns it, why not just hit them up privately?so start a thread to defend yourself.
As far as I see you seem to live for boards trouble.
I want you out of my threads, they accused you as a joke .. Its obvious for everybody, and
and you just keep going at it, with way worst accusation.
I can confirm its not you.
So move on.
thanks.Comment
-
This thread is in the wrong section
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”Comment
-
Indeed. Or stop vaguely threatening lawyers. Man up and send them in if they are on retainer and think you have a case.
Unless of course there is no case and nik is bluffing to save his embarrassement about not buying the most obvious domain he should have!Comment
-
But Damian, the fact that they were threatening lawyers was your ENTIRE argument that what you think I "accused" you of was even a crime!
Which is ridiculous rationale, but, in any case, then you do a complete Romney 180 and YOU accuse ME with absolutely no proof.
WTF? Now I finally see what Paul's talking about - you ARE a liar and you should be banned:
"False accusations will be grounds for immediate banning."Comment
-
What? Like accusing someone of cyber squatting as you did? Sigh.
Rally Reggie, I know you re an ex con with no real education, but stop and think before you post, or nik will threaten you for fucking up h"is" thread
:DComment
-
Put us on ignore then. Or stop reading the thread.
Are you stupid?
If something bothers you that you can stop bothering you why do you keep letting it bother you?
Are you educationally challenged?Comment



Comment