Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
I think you are wrong on that matter. I know for one as I said in some other topic here, I made my choice biased mainly on foreign policy in the last election. In fact that was one of the major reasons Obama won the election, is because he promised to get us out of Iraq and refocus the war on terror.
|
We are leaving Iraq... no matter who wins.
We are leaving Afghanistan... no matter who wins.
The country does not have the stomach for another war of choice... no matter who wins.
Either candidate will use our military to defend our interests.
Either candidate will back Israel.
Either candidate will do all he can to prevent nuclear proliferation.
Both candidates will do the same things to prevent terrorist attacks and respond to them.
Now... go make your voting decision based on foreign policy.
The other 99.999999999% of the voting public will make their decision in this election on economic or social issues. The economy favors Romney, if it was strong Obama would be winning by 20% of the vote. Social issues favor Obama, if Romney wasn't so disingenuous about them he would be winning by 20% of the vote.
The choice is a simple one:
Do you want a faster recovery NO MATTER WHAT negative side effects come with it, and a return to the boom/bust cyclical crashes?
OR
Do you want a slower recovery with sane social issue policies and much better long term prospects for real growth?