isn't it ilegal to squat on domain names?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Retributi0n
    So Fucking Banned
    • Oct 2007
    • 393

    #1

    isn't it ilegal to squat on domain names?

    Isn't their a law that says you have to use a parked domain named eventually? And can't just let it sit there doing nothing forever?
  • ilbb
    Confirmed User
    • May 2005
    • 3025

    #2
    Originally posted by Retributi0n
    Isn't their a law that says you have to use a parked domain named eventually? And can't just let it sit there doing nothing forever?
    owner of the domain can do with it what ever he want

    Comment

    • Shaze
      Confirmed User
      • Oct 2003
      • 2662

      #3
      only if it's a well-known trademarked name
      Adult Search Engine Japanese Porn Thai Porn

      Comment

      • Iron Fist
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Dec 2006
        • 23400

        #4
        Originally posted by Retributi0n
        Isn't their a law that says you have to use a parked domain named eventually? And can't just let it sit there doing nothing forever?
        Wish that were true.... a squatter has been parked on my last name for years.... i've got monitoring and everything enabled on it waiting to jump on it, but they keep renewing it every year....
        i like waffles

        Comment

        • baddog
          So Fucking Banned
          • Apr 2001
          • 107089

          #5
          a law? serious? what code section would that be under?

          Comment

          • JohnnyJames
            Confirmed User
            • Oct 2007
            • 621

            #6
            There was some attempt at this in the US a few years ago. No idea how far it went, but the gist was a regulation to ensure that registered domains were being "utilized" in some fashion. Whatever the hell that means.

            But the US does not own the net, much as most of us Americans seem to think so.

            In any case, whether it passed or not, I have no idea.

            At the same time, most registrars began incorporating search functions or adverts on parking pages, thus "utilizing" the domains and crushing the intent of any such regulation.

            Comment

            • CaptainHowdy
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Dec 2004
              • 94149

              #7
              As far as I'm concerned "domain squatting" reffers to trademark, service mark, or copyright related domains.

              Comment

              • Gerco
                Confirmed User
                • Nov 2005
                • 2052

                #8
                Originally posted by CaptainHowdy
                As far as I'm concerned "domain squatting" reffers to trademark, service mark, or copyright related domains.
                Yes, but a perfect example of why even having those is not enough... http://www.nissan.com/

                In case you have ever wondered why you have to goto nissanusa.com in order to get to Nissan motors site.

                Actually, I'm on the guy side who owns the Nissan site and think nissan is being total dicks in the way they attacked him. Read the Lawsuit, he has it all posted.
                Http://www.extremehole.com

                **** CLOSED ****

                400 HOURS of exclusive custom extreme content, already on external HD in Raw DV ready to encode.
                over 150,000 exclusive images and more.

                Comment

                • Dirty Dane
                  Sick Fuck
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 9491

                  #9
                  They purposed forbidding it on .xxx domains.

                  Comment

                  • Azoy?
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 2178

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Retributi0n
                    Isn't their a law that says you have to use a parked domain named eventually? And can't just let it sit there doing nothing forever?
                    eventually is when ? could be 200 years from now since eventually didn't put a time limit on the time frame.

                    Comment

                    • fatfoo
                      ICQ:649699063
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 27763

                      #11
                      this pic sickens me

                      Send me an email: [email protected]

                      Comment

                      • Retributi0n
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Oct 2007
                        • 393

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Gerco
                        Yes, but a perfect example of why even having those is not enough... http://www.nissan.com/

                        In case you have ever wondered why you have to goto nissanusa.com in order to get to Nissan motors site.

                        Actually, I'm on the guy side who owns the Nissan site and think nissan is being total dicks in the way they attacked him. Read the Lawsuit, he has it all posted.
                        that's fucken ridiculous. They can't sue for Trademark Infringement in that case. It's a completey different industry. Cars / computers. Similar trademarks cannot exist within the same industry , but they can if the industries are completely different.

                        Comment

                        • Video Rob
                          Confirmed User
                          • Oct 2006
                          • 496

                          #13
                          Originally posted by JohnnyJames
                          But the US does not own the net, much as most of us Americans seem to think so.
                          Or the world...

                          Comment

                          • sortie
                            Confirmed User
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 7771

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Gerco
                            Yes, but a perfect example of why even having those is not enough... http://www.nissan.com/

                            In case you have ever wondered why you have to goto nissanusa.com in order to get to Nissan motors site.

                            Actually, I'm on the guy side who owns the Nissan site and think nissan is being total dicks in the way they attacked him. Read the Lawsuit, he has it all posted.
                            The guy's website sux rat balls so I think he should sell the name to Nissan Motors.

                            Comment

                            Working...