Mitt Romney Rolling Stone Article.... It's Over For This Guy

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AndyA
    So Fucking Banned
    • Apr 2001
    • 1670

    #1

    Mitt Romney Rolling Stone Article.... It's Over For This Guy

    I apologize if this was already posted but did anyone read this

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...pital-20120829

    I mean, he calls 47% of Americans parasites.... he is the definition of a parasite
  • beemk
    CLICK HERE
    • Jan 2002
    • 20829

    #2
    47% is way off. I think it's much higher than that.
    I host with Vacares

    Comment

    • bronco67
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Dec 2006
      • 29026

      #3
      Technically, he is done...but the Koch brothers will buy the election.

      Comment

      • DTK
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2002
        • 4546

        #4
        it's been discussed http://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1081112
        Arguing whether the Democratic or Republican party is better is like debating which steaming pile of shit is slightly less stinky.

        Comment

        • DudeRick
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2004
          • 1568

          #5
          Obama down 6% from last week. Keep wishing! ;)

          Comment

          • DTK
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2002
            • 4546

            #6
            Originally posted by DudeRick
            Obama down 6% from last week. Keep wishing! ;)
            try again, dingbat.

            RCP Average 9/4 - 9/17 -- -- 48.4 45.5 Obama +2.9

            http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...bama-1171.html
            Arguing whether the Democratic or Republican party is better is like debating which steaming pile of shit is slightly less stinky.

            Comment

            • Robbie
              Leaner, Meaner, Faster
              • Aug 2002
              • 20960

              #7
              Originally posted by DTK
              try again, dingbat.

              RCP Average 9/4 - 9/17 -- -- 48.4 45.5 Obama +2.9

              http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...bama-1171.html
              He's talking about the brand new poll from Gallup out today:

              http://www.gallup.com/poll/election.aspx
              -Robbie
              ClaudiaMarie.Com

              Comment

              • epitome
                So Fucking Lame
                • Jun 2009
                • 12156

                #8
                Originally posted by Robbie
                He's talking about the brand new poll from Gallup out today:

                http://www.gallup.com/poll/election.aspx
                Nice Headline: "Romney Has Support Among Lowest Income Voters"

                So the people that need taxpayer money the most are going go elect the guy that will cut their funding.

                What is really interesting is that the 47% that Romney slammed are his base. As long as he keeps talking about God, guns and keeping rights away from certain people they'll still vote for him.

                Comment

                • Why
                  MFBA
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 7230

                  #9
                  Originally posted by JohnnyClips
                  lol at people still fighting over democrats and republicans

                  How dumb can people be?
                  how green is grass? how many stars are in the sky?

                  Comment

                  • Robbie
                    Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 20960

                    #10
                    Originally posted by epitome
                    Nice Headline: "Romney Has Support Among Lowest Income Voters"

                    So the people that need taxpayer money the most are going go elect the guy that will cut their funding.
                    I think it shows that even people who do get a govt. check realize it's out of control.
                    Problem is...he's not going to cut the military (neither will Obama to any degree that matters).

                    Looks like the plan is to just keep printing money no matter if Obama or Romney wins.

                    They are both multi-millionaires (as are every member of Congress and the Senate), so they will all keep the gravy train of money going until it crashes I guess.

                    Reality is...it won't affect Romney OR Obama. They are both rich as hell and both have enough political and financial connections to ride out any economic storm that may come.

                    Only dumbasses like all of us will suffer.
                    -Robbie
                    ClaudiaMarie.Com

                    Comment

                    • DTK
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2002
                      • 4546

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Robbie
                      He's talking about the brand new poll from Gallup out today:

                      http://www.gallup.com/poll/election.aspx
                      I don't have a dog in the fight (because they're both dogs), but RealClearPolitics.com aggregates numerous polls, thus giving a more clear picture than a single poll can do.

                      Gallup's 7 day tracking shows: Gallup Tracking 9/11 - 9/17 3050 RV 2.0 47 46 Obama +1
                      Last edited by DTK; 09-18-2012, 12:50 PM.
                      Arguing whether the Democratic or Republican party is better is like debating which steaming pile of shit is slightly less stinky.

                      Comment

                      • Robbie
                        Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                        • Aug 2002
                        • 20960

                        #12
                        Originally posted by DTK
                        I don't have a dog in the fight (because they're both dogs), but RealClearPolitics.com aggregates numerous polls, thus giving a more clear picture than a single poll can do.
                        Yes, but they are aggregating polls that are not accurate. (remember "shit in, shit out") Gallup is much more accurate than say an MSNBC poll or a Fox News Poll. So you take all that crap out when you see the Gallup poll.

                        I don't know how much credence is given to the Rasmussen Poll...but I have heard it spoken about with respect from both "sides" as well.

                        They are showing Romney ahead by 4 points today:
                        http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._tracking_poll
                        -Robbie
                        ClaudiaMarie.Com

                        Comment

                        • Why
                          MFBA
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 7230

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Robbie
                          I think it shows that even people who do get a govt. check realize it's out of control.
                          Problem is...he's not going to cut the military (neither will Obama to any degree that matters).

                          Looks like the plan is to just keep printing money no matter if Obama or Romney wins.

                          They are both multi-millionaires (as are every member of Congress and the Senate), so they will all keep the gravy train of money going until it crashes I guess.

                          Reality is...it won't affect Romney OR Obama. They are both rich as hell and both have enough political and financial connections to ride out any economic storm that may come.

                          Only dumbasses like all of us will suffer.
                          at least state facts... every member of the house and senate is not a multimillionaire, in fact some are not even millionaires.

                          romney is much wealthier then obama, like at least 10x.

                          Comment

                          • Robbie
                            Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 20960

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Why
                            at least state facts... every member of the house and senate is not a multimillionaire, in fact some are not even millionaires.

                            romney is much wealthier then obama, like at least 10x.
                            Oh yeah...Ron Paul isn't. lol

                            I think you get my drift. Anyone in the Senate or Congress who is a career politician is a multi-millionaire. The one's who aren't just haven't been there long enough yet to set up the deals back home with companies to funnel money back to them and get it sent back around in a way that looks "innocent".

                            And Obama is a multi-millionaire...you can try to make it out like he's just a "poor" multi-millionaire, but face facts: he's one of the "1%" even though you don't want to say that.
                            Don't know how he got that way since he's never had any job in the private sector. Must be that good ol' tax money getting funneled around and coming back home to roost.
                            -Robbie
                            ClaudiaMarie.Com

                            Comment

                            • DudeRick
                              Confirmed User
                              • Feb 2004
                              • 1568

                              #15
                              Originally posted by DTK
                              try again, dingbat.

                              RCP Average 9/4 - 9/17 -- -- 48.4 45.5 Obama +2.9

                              http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...bama-1171.html
                              Try again dipshit...

                              Mitt Romney's presidential bid has been gleefully portrayed as doomed after a series of supposed stumbles that have delighted Democrats.

                              Voters, however, apparently view things rather differently.

                              Romney has closed to just one point behind Barack Obama - a drop of six percentage points in a week for the President, according to the latest Gallup tracking poll released on Tuesday. Obama is now on 47 points and Romney 46.

                              Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz26rJg6Dyt

                              Comment

                              • DudeRick
                                Confirmed User
                                • Feb 2004
                                • 1568

                                #16
                                WSJ The Data Behind Romney?s 47% Comments

                                In his comments to fundraisers captured on video, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said 47% of Americans would almost automatically vote for President Barack Obama because they were ?dependent? on the government, in part because they received government benefits and paid no federal income taxes.

                                http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/0...s-47-comments/

                                Comment

                                • mynameisjim
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2007
                                  • 2985

                                  #17
                                  Well, national polls don't matter all. It's a state by state election. The national or popular vote means nothing, just ask Al Gore.

                                  A big part of this comes down to Ohio. If he can't win Ohio, he has to nearly run the table on every other state. The polls coming out of Ohio and a few other states are the only ones that matter and the only ones the campaigns look at.
                                  jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert

                                  Comment

                                  • Robbie
                                    Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                                    • Aug 2002
                                    • 20960

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by mynameisjim
                                    Well, national polls don't matter all. It's a state by state election. The national or popular vote means nothing, just ask Al Gore.

                                    A big part of this comes down to Ohio. If he can't win Ohio, he has to nearly run the table on every other state. The polls coming out of Ohio and a few other states are the only ones that matter and the only ones the campaigns look at.
                                    That seems to be what I see on the news. It's like every state is already either Dem or Repub except a few like Ohio.

                                    I wonder if that's really true? How the heck did Obama carry the Repub states in the last election though? Or Bush carry the Dem states in the past?
                                    Or did they just happen to win the swing states only (other than the states the media are telling us are pre-determined)?

                                    I'm really starting to question the poll numbers and charts from the media. They were way off-base on that recall vote in Wisconsin. Hell, Ed Shulz on MSNBC was actually broadcasting outside the capital in Wisconsin when that vote happened and gleefully showing exit poll numbers that they had and claiming it was all over. lol
                                    Then the next day he looked like somebody had took his lunch money or something.
                                    -Robbie
                                    ClaudiaMarie.Com

                                    Comment

                                    • Rochard
                                      Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                      • Dec 2001
                                      • 75733

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Robbie
                                      Oh yeah...Ron Paul isn't. lol

                                      I think you get my drift. Anyone in the Senate or Congress who is a career politician is a multi-millionaire. The one's who aren't just haven't been there long enough yet to set up the deals back home with companies to funnel money back to them and get it sent back around in a way that looks "innocent".

                                      And Obama is a multi-millionaire...you can try to make it out like he's just a "poor" multi-millionaire, but face facts: he's one of the "1%" even though you don't want to say that.
                                      Don't know how he got that way since he's never had any job in the private sector. Must be that good ol' tax money getting funneled around and coming back home to roost.
                                      Yeah, Obama is a multi-millionaire. Ironically, they are both part of the "1%" that OWS bitch about.
                                      Herschel Savage
                                      Brooklyn, NY

                                      Comment

                                      • Juicy D. Links
                                        So Fucking Banned
                                        • Apr 2001
                                        • 122992

                                        #20
                                        Romney looks like he is pacing a 10 inch cock under those pants..

                                        Comment

                                        • KillerK
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • May 2008
                                          • 3406

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by mynameisjim
                                          Well, national polls don't matter all. It's a state by state election. The national or popular vote means nothing, just ask Al Gore.

                                          A big part of this comes down to Ohio. If he can't win Ohio, he has to nearly run the table on every other state. The polls coming out of Ohio and a few other states are the only ones that matter and the only ones the campaigns look at.
                                          Seems wrong that 1 state would have that much sway, when that state doesn't even matter to people who don't live there.

                                          Comment

                                          • Robbie
                                            Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                                            • Aug 2002
                                            • 20960

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by KillerK
                                            Seems wrong that 1 state would have that much sway, when that state doesn't even matter to people who don't live there.
                                            I think it's bullshit that the electoral college numbers don't follow the percentage of votes too.

                                            What I mean is...it SHOULD be that if a guy gets 30% of the popular vote in a state, he should get 30% of that states electoral votes.

                                            But it's "winner take all" Which means that Romney could get 51% to Obama's 49% in a particular state (maybe only by a couple of hundred votes) but he gets 100% of the electoral votes.
                                            It's total bullshit.
                                            -Robbie
                                            ClaudiaMarie.Com

                                            Comment

                                            • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                              Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
                                              • Jul 2004
                                              • 38323

                                              #23




                                              ADG
                                              Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



                                              Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

                                              Comment

                                              • KillerK
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • May 2008
                                                • 3406

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Robbie
                                                I think it's bullshit that the electoral college numbers don't follow the percentage of votes too.

                                                What I mean is...it SHOULD be that if a guy gets 30% of the popular vote in a state, he should get 30% of that states electoral votes.

                                                But it's "winner take all" Which means that Romney could get 51% to Obama's 49% in a particular state (maybe only by a couple of hundred votes) but he gets 100% of the electoral votes.
                                                It's total bullshit.
                                                Yes that would make more sense right? However I would prefer just to goto a popular vote only. That way every vote counts.

                                                Comment

                                                • Robbie
                                                  Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                                                  • Aug 2002
                                                  • 20960

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by KillerK
                                                  Yes that would make more sense right? However I would prefer just to goto a popular vote only. That way every vote counts.
                                                  I agree. I think both parties are afraid of that though.

                                                  Actually...I saw Jesse Ventura on Piers Morgan yesterday talking about a run for President in 2016 with NO Party affiliation at all! Not even Independent!

                                                  He's a very interesting guy and I'd like to see him run for President to see what happens.
                                                  -Robbie
                                                  ClaudiaMarie.Com

                                                  Comment

                                                  • bronco67
                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                    • Dec 2006
                                                    • 29026

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by DudeRick
                                                    WSJ The Data Behind Romney’s 47% Comments

                                                    In his comments to fundraisers captured on video, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said 47% of Americans would almost automatically vote for President Barack Obama because they were “dependent” on the government, in part because they received government benefits and paid no federal income taxes.

                                                    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/0...s-47-comments/
                                                    there's lots of analysis of the "47%" data, like that's what really matters. Most what he said isn't far off the mark. The important thing to note about that leaked video is the fact that Romney was acting like an elitist asshole with behavior not becoming of a man running for for president. That's what should be under discussion. He's a lower form of life.

                                                    This isn't an isolated incident. There's video evidence of him being a heartless dickwad on multiple occasions.
                                                    Last edited by bronco67; 09-18-2012, 05:59 PM.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • pornmasta
                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                      • Jun 2006
                                                      • 19813

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude



                                                      ADG


                                                      Comment

                                                      • Redrob
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Oct 2004
                                                        • 4791

                                                        #28
                                                        As a vet, I know most of the US's enlisted military men fall in the income group that pays no federal income taxes ($18K/yr). I don't consider them to be leeches on society just because they fall into the "no tax" group.

                                                        Rmoney sucks!

                                                        Comment

                                                        • PornoMonster
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Mar 2003
                                                          • 2257

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by DudeRick
                                                          WSJ The Data Behind Romney?s 47% Comments

                                                          In his comments to fundraisers captured on video, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said 47% of Americans would almost automatically vote for President Barack Obama because they were ?dependent? on the government, in part because they received government benefits and paid no federal income taxes.

                                                          http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/0...s-47-comments/
                                                          And what is wrong with the Truth? Or what someone believes is the Truth? Who would the vote for someone to take away the free stuff?
                                                          $6 a Month 4 Blade Razors, 4 Cartridges, Includes shipping!

                                                          Domains 4 Sale CashForVideos.com - Pussy.biz - FootPorn.com - SoloMovie.com - CollegeGirlCams.com - AmateurCamGirls.com - PR3 4 Letter Domain

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Robbie
                                                            Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                                                            • Aug 2002
                                                            • 20960

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Redrob
                                                            As a vet, I know most of the US's enlisted military men fall in the income group that pays no federal income taxes ($18K/yr). I don't consider them to be leeches on society just because they fall into the "no tax" group.

                                                            Rmoney sucks!
                                                            http://www.goarmy.com/benefits/money...-soldiers.html

                                                            "Chart reflects Basic Pay only and does not include bonuses, allowances and other benefits. Learn about
                                                            total Army compensation."

                                                            I have family in the military. It's VERY good (unless you're getting shot at...which most are not)

                                                            And active military does pay some income tax...but it's a pretty sweet deal for sure:
                                                            "Basic pay and most other pays are generally subject to federal income tax; however, certain allowances are not taxed, such as the basic allowances for housing and subsistence. DOD considers the federal tax advantage as the additional income military members would have to earn in order to receive their current take-home pay if their allowances for housing and subsistence were taxable. In fact, DOD views the federal tax advantage as part of service members' cash compensation when it compares military pay with civilian pay. "
                                                            -Robbie
                                                            ClaudiaMarie.Com

                                                            Comment

                                                            • mineistaken
                                                              See signature :)
                                                              • Apr 2007
                                                              • 29656

                                                              #31
                                                              harsh, but true.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Relentless
                                                                www.EngineFood.com
                                                                • Aug 2006
                                                                • 5697

                                                                #32
                                                                Look at all the tax free advantages these 'moochers' get!
                                                                http://militaryadvantage.military.co...or-recipeints/
                                                                Clearly all our problems would be solved if we started taxing their pension and used that money to fund tax loopholes for hedge fund managers instead...

                                                                After all, Congressional Medal of Honor winners aren't technically 'job creators', they are only patriots, heros and national treasures.


                                                                Website Secure | Engine Food
                                                                ICQ# 266-942-896

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Coup
                                                                  🚨 PBBC International 🚨
                                                                  • Apr 2010
                                                                  • 9931

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by AndyA
                                                                  I apologize if this was already posted but did anyone read this

                                                                  http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...pital-20120829

                                                                  I mean, he calls 47% of Americans parasites.... he is the definition of a parasite


                                                                  Matt Taibbi is a badass. Great fucking article.

                                                                  Obama ran on "change" in 2008, but Mitt Romney represents a far more real and seismic shift in the American landscape. Romney is the frontman and apostle of an economic revolution, in which transactions are manufactured instead of products, wealth is generated without accompanying prosperity, and Cayman Islands partnerships are lovingly erected and nurtured while American communities fall apart. The entire purpose of the business model that Romney helped pioneer is to move money into the archipelago from the places outside it, using massive amounts of taxpayer-subsidized debt to enrich a handful of billionaires. It's a vision of society that's crazy, vicious and almost unbelievably selfish, yet it's running for president, and it has a chance of winning. Perhaps that change is coming whether we like it or not. Perhaps Mitt Romney is the best man to manage the transition. But it seems a little early to vote for that kind of wholesale surrender.

                                                                  Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...#ixzz26st5U9In
                                                                  Last edited by Coup; 09-18-2012, 07:53 PM.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  Working...