Senate Bill 1959 to Criminalize Thoughts, Blogs, Books and Free Speech Across America

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GreyWolf
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jun 2007
    • 2036

    #51
    Originally posted by DaddyHalbucks
    Lies?

    Saddam's gassing of civilians at Halabja actually happpened.

    Saddam's attempted assasination of GHW Bush actually happened.

    Saddam's murdering hundreds of thousands of his own citizens actually happened.

    Saddam's invasion of Kuwait actually happened.

    Did Saddam also have WMD? Many experts believe he did, and a massive program to hide it. The CIA believed he did, same with the US Congress, same with the Clinton administration.
    How many times do you have to be proven to be a complete asshole on this subject - yet you still spew the usual propaganda garbage over and over??

    Where are the WMD's again??? In a riverbed and shipped out to Sudan?? Did the US govt not consider Saddam an ally and trade with him while he gassed civilians and murdered people?? Did the US govt not really arrange for Saddam to murder democratically elected govt ministers in Iran??

    Lies? Yes... many of them - not just one.
    Last edited by GreyWolf; 12-01-2007, 11:52 AM.

    Comment

    • GreyWolf
      So Fucking Banned
      • Jun 2007
      • 2036

      #52
      Seriously DH - that scenario is just another example of "use and abuse" - use and promote thug dictators for own selfish gain - in this instance oil, and encourage them to invade other countries for "own" interest.

      Don't delude yourself that the US govt cares a toss about people being murdered - as long as it suits their predatory interests.

      It's what all freedom loving nations do eh??
      Last edited by GreyWolf; 12-01-2007, 12:04 PM.

      Comment

      • directfiesta
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Oct 2002
        • 30190

        #53
        Naw, no problem with this honest administration .. they would never push the enveloppe on this law ....

        Secrecy Invoked on Abramoff Lawsuits


        Saturday December 1, 2007 9:16 PM

        By PETE YOST

        WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration is laying out a new secrecy defense in an effort to end a court battle about the White House visits of now-imprisoned lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

        The administration agreed last year to produce all responsive records about the visits ``without redactions or claims of exemption,'' according to a court order.

        But in a court filing Friday night, administration lawyers said that the Secret Service has identified a category of highly sensitive documents that might contain information sought in a lawsuit about Abramoff's trips to the White House.

        The Justice Department, citing a Cold War-era court ruling, declared that the contents of the ``Sensitive Security Records'' cannot be publicly revealed even though they could show whether Abramoff made more visits to the White House than those already acknowledged.

        http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlates...119568,00.html
        this should give you the " spirit " of your administration
        I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

        But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

        Comment

        • 12clicks
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jan 2001
          • 19814

          #54
          Originally posted by directfiesta
          usual clueless idiot answer ....
          what's it like being so smart and having the whole world ignore you?
          I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

          Comment

          • GITZINGER
            Confirmed User
            • Oct 2006
            • 929

            #55
            Originally posted by 12clicks
            what's it like being so smart and having the whole world ignore you?
            yawn. typical attention whore post.
            Your momma was a ho!!!

            Comment

            • DaddyHalbucks
              A freakin' legend!
              • Feb 2004
              • 18975

              #56
              Originally posted by GreyWolf
              Seriously DH - that scenario is just another example of "use and abuse" - use and promote thug dictators for own selfish gain - in this instance oil, and encourage them to invade other countries for "own" interest.

              Don't delude yourself that the US govt cares a toss about people being murdered - as long as it suits their predatory interests.

              It's what all freedom loving nations do eh??
              GWB was very upfront, he said that oil was part of the reason for our involvement in Iraq, that it is part of our strategic national interest.
              Boner Money

              Comment

              Working...