After all the years I spent fighting .XXX, it's kind of fun to be on the sidelines now watching Manwin at work.
This is, without a doubt, my favorite paragraph in some time:
"At the very least, the misrepresentation of support from adult entertainment companies, the generation of fake comments in support of .XXX, the submission of misleadingly edited videos and photos, the non-disclosure that certain celebrity adult entertainment supporters of .XXX were paid by ICM, and the creation of a supposedly independent sponsoring entity [the International Foundation for Online Responsibility ? ed.] that was in fact controlled by ICM, are sufficient allegations to establish improper, anticompetitive conduct? under existing case law, Gutierrez wrote."
http://www.ynot.com/content/118136-m...icm-icann.html
I sooooo hope that Manwin finds a way to pry out of lock up those "letters of support" that we've all heard that ICM sent to ICANN.... I would looovveeeee to see once and for all who sent those.
This is, without a doubt, my favorite paragraph in some time:
"At the very least, the misrepresentation of support from adult entertainment companies, the generation of fake comments in support of .XXX, the submission of misleadingly edited videos and photos, the non-disclosure that certain celebrity adult entertainment supporters of .XXX were paid by ICM, and the creation of a supposedly independent sponsoring entity [the International Foundation for Online Responsibility ? ed.] that was in fact controlled by ICM, are sufficient allegations to establish improper, anticompetitive conduct? under existing case law, Gutierrez wrote."
http://www.ynot.com/content/118136-m...icm-icann.html
I sooooo hope that Manwin finds a way to pry out of lock up those "letters of support" that we've all heard that ICM sent to ICANN.... I would looovveeeee to see once and for all who sent those.
Comment