Should GFY Block Old Threads From Being Bumped?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Porn Nerd
    Living The Dream
    • Jun 2009
    • 19784

    #1

    Should GFY Block Old Threads From Being Bumped?

    Okay, I've got enough to do besides having to check the thread dates for every damn thread I visit in a day. Shit, I might check out 20-30 threads or more a day so what, I'm supposed to LOOK at DATES and decide if I should post in a thread from 2007? Am I supposed to ponder the MEANING of WHY someone would bump a thread from 2011? Is there supposed to be some SIGNIFICANCE in the fact that a thread from 2005 was bumped TODAY or is it just some WANKER fucking with us? And I should decipher all this because...?

    Please, we're all very busy people...

    So I say old threads should not be allowed to be bumped to the first page. Maybe the SECOND page but the front should be reserved for shit that's happening now and relevant today.

    Agree or disagree?
    (And is there an old thread someone could bump going over this very issue?)
    46
    Yes, it bugs me.
    0%
    14
    No, who fucking cares.
    0%
    32

    The poll is expired.

    My Affiliate Programs:
    Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold

    Over 90 paysites to promote!
    Now on Teams: peabodymedia
  • Barefootsies
    Choice is an Illusion
    • Feb 2005
    • 42635

    #2
    Yes they should.

    Some idiot troll gets butthurt, and then goes about bumping 20 threads. It clutters up the forum with bullshit.

    Should You Email Your Members?

    Link1 | Link2 | Link3

    Enough Said.

    "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

    Comment

    • PR_Glen
      Confirmed User
      • Oct 2006
      • 9058

      #3
      depends on the use.. bumping an old one to continue or update on a specific topic i can understand, but bumping old spam threads is a pain in the ass and this one guy doing it should be told to knock it off.
      webmaster at pimproll dot com

      Comment

      • Barefootsies
        Choice is an Illusion
        • Feb 2005
        • 42635

        #4
        Originally posted by PR_Glen
        depends on the use.. bumping an old one to continue or update on a specific topic i can understand, but bumping old spam threads is a pain in the ass and this one guy doing it should be told to knock it off.
        ...or huckleberried for their pleasure.

        It's usually someone previously banned, or a fake nick anyway doing it 9 of 10 times.
        Should You Email Your Members?

        Link1 | Link2 | Link3

        Enough Said.

        "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

        Comment

        • alf6300
          Confirmed User
          • Sep 2007
          • 765

          #5
          Agree 85% of cases. There are 15% of old threads, though, that are worth/informative/interesting/fun to be bumped.
          Second page would be fine but it could make things unnecessary complicated (never seen a forum with such a rule, I am not sure how it would look like).

          I see the point, but one of the good things of GFY is that it has something like 3 simple rules, the rest is community driven and community-enforced.
          --

          Comment

          • Freaky_Akula
            Confirmed User
            • Oct 2005
            • 3670

            #6
            No, but the trolls that bump them for fun should be banned.

            Comment

            • Sarah_Jayne
              Now with more Jayne
              • Dec 2002
              • 40077

              #7
              I agree that it depends on the thread. There are some educational threads that are worth bumping. The 'spam me' threads from two years ago are not.

              Comment

              • Freaky_Akula
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2005
                • 3670

                #8
                And all Paul Markham's threads should be blocked from being bumped.

                Comment

                • wehateporn
                  Promoting Debate on GFY
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 27176

                  #9
                  Made a note in my diary to bump this 5 years from now

                  Comment

                  • sojproductions
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 2160

                    #10
                    they could still be bumped but anything with a start date of over 1 year should be flagged via an icon or something, that would be better.
                    ICQ: 404-159-022

                    Blue Pixels Profits - Uk Solo Tranny sites & Crossdressing!
                    Filthy Profits - Uk MILF Solo Sites

                    Comment

                    • JFK
                      FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 67373

                      #11
                      mutiple old thread bumping is a pain in the ass, when some idiot bumps 10 posts. On the other hand there are some creative bumps, which are fun. Let's not forget the name of this place

                      FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
                      For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

                      Comment

                      • Buff
                        GFY Assassin
                        • May 2003
                        • 2993

                        #12
                        Most of you don't want the stupid shit you say and stupid predictions you've made to come back to haunt you. I say fuck that. Nothing wrong with bumping old threads.

                        Comment

                        • michael.kickass
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 11039

                          #13
                          It doesn't make much sense to bump old threads IMHO.
                          NICERATIOS - $30 PPS - 50% Rev Share - 5% WM Referral - High Converting Sites!
                          Any questions about your NICERATIOS account? Vanessa will take care of you: [email protected]

                          Looking to expand your business in general, maybe sell your sites? Contact me:
                          [email protected]

                          Comment

                          • sarettah
                            see you later, I'm gone
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 14293

                            #14
                            A compromise could be to show the date the thread was started alongside the last post date so that we could see that it is an old thread before clicking into it.

                            .
                            All cookies cleared!

                            Comment

                            • Barefootsies
                              Choice is an Illusion
                              • Feb 2005
                              • 42635

                              #15
                              Originally posted by sarettah
                              A compromise could be to show the date the thread was started alongside the last post date so that we could see that it is an old thread before clicking into it.
                              That is making the ASSuption that someone did a search, and is posting in it, because of some random educational value. Which, as you and I both know, is not the case most of the time. Most of those being bumped are to troll someone because the bumper is butthurt.

                              As for citing some thread and bullshit predictions from years gone by, do you not know how to post a link?
                              Should You Email Your Members?

                              Link1 | Link2 | Link3

                              Enough Said.

                              "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

                              Comment

                              Working...