BodaciousTatas.com ... Famous Domain - taking offers - let's start at $500 USD

**BetChips** · 11-11-2007, 02:57 PM

good luck bump!

**detroitbikinicarwash** · 11-11-2007, 03:07 PM

6 Month Spots for sale $10 each hit me up!. bump for ya!

**candyflip** · 11-11-2007, 04:56 PM

What makes this so famous? Seems a bit overpriced to me.

**Sebastian Sands** · 11-11-2007, 08:09 PM

I don't get the famous part either. Or are you trying to say it's famous because of Bodacious magazine? They can snag that name from you for free if they wanted to, you realize that right? I don't touch trademarked stuff.

**Ron Bennett** · 11-11-2007, 11:02 PM

It's not a TM - it's a commonly used phrase...

http://www.definition-of.com/bodacious+tatas

definition of bodacious tatas:

(Adult) Current slang usage for large female breasts. ' Bodacious set of tatas.' From the movie: An Officer and a Gentleman (1982). See breasts for synonyms and euphemisms.

In regards to fame ... google bodacioustatas.com and varients - and in particular check out http://www.bodacious-tatas.org with more details about what the phrase means and related discussion of domains that contain that phrase ...

In regards to value, bodacioustatas.com is worth $500 for sure, since I've received offers in that ballpark in the past.

Ron

p.s. I also have CuntFuck.com for sale - taking offers. [email protected]

**Juilan** · 11-12-2007, 09:08 AM

Fun name! Is the monthly traffic mentioned type in traffic or another source?

**Ron Bennett** · 11-12-2007, 08:31 PM

Type-in traffic for both, as far as I can tell.

Ron

**DaddyHalbucks** · 11-12-2007, 11:38 PM

There was a famous UDRP on BODACIOUS-TATAS.COM

**Ron Bennett** · 11-13-2007, 09:24 AM

Yes, there was ... and is among the most famous, worst UDRP decisions ever handed down...

It's important to note that the "respondent" did NOT respond to the UDRP in a timely manner - if they had, the decision would have likely been very different, as in Tatas would have lost.

One can find numerous bad UDRP decisions that wouldn't have happened, if the respondent had simply responded - costs nothing to respond, though there is an added cost to the respondent, if choosing an expanded 3 party panel, which is often highly recommended to better ensure a fair decision.

Ron

**DaddyHalbucks** · 11-13-2007, 02:02 PM

Originally posted by Ron Bennett

Yes, there was ... and is among the most famous, worst UDRP decisions ever handed down...

It's important to note that the "respondent" did NOT respond to the UDRP in a timely manner - if they had, the decision would have likely been very different, as in Tatas would have lost.

One can find numerous bad UDRP decisions that wouldn't have happened, if the respondent had simply responded - costs nothing to respond, though there is an added cost to the respondent, if choosing an expanded 3 party panel, which is often highly recommended to better ensure a fair decision.

Ron

I agree.

One of the most "infamous" UDRP decisions is more like it.

BodaciousTatas.com ... Famous Domain - taking offers - let's start at $500 USD

BodaciousTatas.com ... Famous Domain - taking offers - let's start at $500 USD

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment