Interesting, because a site owned by the same Aaron Jacques (whom owned and registered jacquesweb.com) was ordered forfeited by an Arbitration Panel in 2007, since Mr Jacques was using the Barbie children's toy trademark to redirect people to porn sites:
To summarize, Gideon...er, Mr Jacques' defense (the owner of jacquesweb.com) was that "(Mattel?s) United States trademark registrations are irrelevant because Respondent is a Canadian resident. Respondent further argues that the BARBIE mark is generic."
Typical Gallbladder style to believe he can pick and choose which laws to follow, and the attitude that he can decide that other people's trademarks and intellectual property are generic and use them to profit from however he wishes.
The arbitration panel ruled against Aaron Jacques and stripped him of his domain since they felt that he acted in bad faith and abused the popular children's toy brand trademark to drive traffic to porn sites.
Great corporate citizen.
I can see why companies like Akira Systems would want to be disassociated with such a lowlife, if it turns out to indeed be the same person.
Gideon still hasn't quite given us a straight answer about that either...well, at least he is finally getting the attention from the industry that he has so desperately craved for years.
ADG
Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
If I were a GFY Mod, and GG = Aaron Jacques, I would pin this to Mr. Fair Use's (GideonGallery's) sig:
The (National Arbitration Forum) Panel finds that Respondent?s (Aaron Jacque's) use of Complainant?s BARBIE mark to divert Internet users to an adult-oriented website does not constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services under Policy ¶ 4(c)(i), nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use under Policy ¶ 4(c)(iii).
Yup, Gideon sure is a real expert on Fair Use.
I hope he didn't get a patent/trademark/copyright for posting in bold and in CAPS to emphasize his points.
ADG
Originally posted by CamTata
nice find ADG
Originally posted by CamTata
We have an address match - it is the infamous gg
Originally posted by Paul Markham
That post proves what we always suspected. The guy has no qualms stealing other people's property.
IMO his employers are well shot of him.
Originally posted by Paul Markham
The more we dig the shittier it gets. This guy is a douche bag.
I need to get some sleep and focus on more positive things tomorrow...
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
Ha someone just made a small joke about Gideon.
Saying if Gideon was a bank robber, he would hang out a police station all day long telling anyone who would listen, how robbing banks is ok. A little bank robbery should be allowed he would tell the cops..lol
So... let me get this straight. You lost your domain to Mattel because you were using their BARBIE logo to redirect kids to porn sites, but you claim you have nothing to do with spamming lolita sites? Whatever.
GG if you want to blame someone, look in the mirror. You simply fucked with the wrong crowd for too long and got a kick out of it. If there are any more skeletons in your closet, be sure this lot will find them and expose you. We even have your home address.
buy brazzers membership, copy everything for 30$, set up own web site, "time-shift" "format-shift" everything to own website, claim "fair use", make $$, AND charge 50$ for DMCA processing
thats like charging a whore 50$ for letting her suck your dick
So... let me get this straight. You lost your domain to Mattel because you were using their BARBIE logo to redirect kids to porn sites, but you claim you have nothing to do with spamming lolita sites? Whatever.
1. it was a domain dispute for lennybarbie.com not a logo (seriously stop twisting the facts)-- the name of a pornstar btw.
2. I did not claim it was generic i pointed to the unanimous 8-0 canadian supreme court decision against mattel explicitly ruling that use of the name barbie as a prenom/surnom (first or last name was not a violation of their trademark) and it fact a generic use of the term http://www.sexypornstars.net/dispute/supremecourt.pdf
3. the lawyer misrepresented Renaissance Hotel Holdings, Inc. v. Renaissance Cochin, FA 932344 (Nat. Arb. Forum Apr. 23, 2007) which only justifies accepting a foreign registered trademark for consideration under another country to justify completely ignoring the supreme court decision when he should done exactly what the previous arbitrator did in the referring case (accept the american registration and determine validity by Canadian law)
4. and then claiming i didn't present any evidence(ie represent the porn star lenny barbie) to argue i was in default. btw if you ask around on this board you will find out that pornstar changed her name because of a dispute with mattel (they gave up i believe because they didn't know about the supreme court decision) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanny_Barby
As Respondent has not provided any substantive arguments pertaining to the rights or legitimate interests prong of this analysis, Respondent has essentially defaulted on this issue. In view of this ?default,? the Panel accepts all reasonable allegations and inferences set forth in the Complaint regarding the confusing similarity issue as true.
Unfortunately because of the blanket immunity granted for "accidental" violations of the law that there is nothing i could do to get the domain back cost effectively.
“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
"The Rules for Posting to Gideon Gallery.
You must own or have license to use the content provided in your galleries. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PUBLIC DOMAIN ADULT CONTENT."
appears gideon"fair use"gallery has undergone a dramatic transformation
Unfortunately because of the blanket immunity granted for "accidental" violations of the law that there is nothing i could do to get the domain back cost effectively.
So you were fucked by the lawyer ?
I think they call that the Shawshank defense.....
"Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
“There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
“a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com
What about the cp spam? And don't say it was altered. The post about it was months before you even joined gfy and was received by a number of people that also commented in the original thread.
What about the cp spam? And don't say it was altered. The post about it was months before you even joined gfy and was received by a number of people that also commented in the original thread.
Sick fuck!
.
Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
So jacquesweb.com (the part you omitted) is not your website?
Baad me milte hain,
ADG
do neither of you guys understand the difference between the header information which tells you where the message came from
and the reply to address that you get to manually fill in with whatever you want.
why do you think i posted the header information that he specifically cut off when he was making the bogus claim.
“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
Amazing that gideongallery keeps bumping this thread as himself and uniquemkt
If he had just left everything alone this would have all died down. Instead he is bringing MORE of his shady life out in the open by continuing to piss people off.
I will try to help you ONE more time gideongallery. Just stop posting. Go away and live your shitty life. Be happy and enjoy life. Everytime you post here you just bring yourself one step closer to ruin because of your own actions and words over the last few years.
why do you think i posted the header information that he specifically cut off when he was making the bogus claim.
Let me get this right ... He posted a thread about cp spam months before you even joined gfy, making a bogus claim against someone that at the time wasn't even here? Have I got that right or are you still just full of shit?
Let me get this right ... He posted a thread about cp spam months before you even joined gfy, making a bogus claim against someone that at the time wasn't even here? Have I got that right or are you still just full of shit?
So he altered this before you even joined just to frame you? And other guys in the thread got the same spam?
.
he out time shifted gideon by two months
“If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
-- Ulysses S. Grant
Let me get this right ... He posted a thread about cp spam months before you even joined gfy, making a bogus claim against someone that at the time wasn't even here? Have I got that right or are you still just full of shit?
.
someone spoofed my domain address in the reply to address
tala here posted the complete header which included the information that proved that fact
tala decide to deliberately cut off the header proved the spoofing when he posted it here
don't you understand how to read an email header.
“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
someone spoofed my domain address in the reply to address
Seems like you are always the victim, and you think that anyone that disagrees with you is persecuting poor GideonGallery.
Like when you got the slap down for using the Barbie children's toy trademark to trick people and redirect them to other porn sites, which you now blame on your lawyer.
You lost that case on Fair Use grounds, but since you still like to think of yourself as Mr Fair Use, please cite the Fair Use cases which you have actually won, because I couldn't find any (I could only find a Fair Use case which you clearly LOST)?
It appears that since you can't make a living as a legitimate webmaster, you cockroach around at the dark edges of the net trying to steal whatever crumbs you can, and your posts are just clumsy contrived rationalizations for your fraudulent activities.
Seems like you are always the victim, and you think that anyone that disagrees with you is persecuting poor GideonGallery.
Like when you got the slap down for using the Barbie children's toy trademark to trick people and redirect them to other porn sites, which you now blame on your lawyer.
You lost that case on Fair Use grounds, but since you still like to think of yourself as Mr Fair Use, please cite the Fair Use cases which you have actually won, because I couldn't find any (I could only find a Fair Use case which you clearly LOST)?
It appears that since you can't make a living as a legitimate webmaster, you cockroach around at the dark edges of the net trying to steal whatever crumbs you can, and your posts are just clumsy contrived rationalizations for your fraudulent activities.
ADG
I was going to suggest you check out the video he had removed from youtube for copyright violations. . . but it appears he has closed his youtube account. http://www.youtube.com/user/MrAaronjacques
I was going to suggest you check out the video he had removed from youtube for copyright violations. . . but it appears he has closed his youtube account. http://www.youtube.com/user/MrAaronjacques
If he were smart he would close ALL of his accounts online (especially his GFY account)
He has put HIMSELF in a world of shit. All of his own doing, and his own words.
I was going to suggest you check out the video he had removed from youtube for copyright violations. . . but it appears he has closed his youtube account. http://www.youtube.com/user/MrAaronjacques
Go ahead and please summarize the video for us, since it is next to impossible to get any straight answers from Gideon the Dissembler.
Aaron Jacques' Twitter, is chock full of (bad) advice and nonsense about Fair Use, such as this gem, "actually it because itunes "doesn't understand" fair use".
In other news, the People's Republic of China announced that it too is suing porn actress China Barbie, stating that her use of China as a first name is a bad faith attempt to profit from the use of a nation opposed to porn.
However, the People's Republic of China did agree to drop their suit if China Barbie changes her name to Taiwan Barbie...
ADG
Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
WTF? Mattel is lucky they never sued Barbie Benton - Hef would have defended her on free speech grounds:
Who's next? Lanny Barbie...
ADG
Originally posted by Dugmor
Exactly.... I already made a huge profit just from buying the domain and redirecting it to Lanie's site with my linking code !
I made the most when she was on the cover of Penthouse !
I fu*ked her... so what else could I want from a the word "Barbie"
btw lenny barbie was an alternative name of the porn star you were complaining about in that china barbie thread
What i was doing with it was exactly the same thing that dugmor was doing.
please stop claiming i was sending kids to porn sites nothing could be farther from the truth.
Go ahead and please summarize the video for us, since it is next to impossible to get any straight answers from Gideon the Dissembler.
Aaron Jacques' Twitter, is chock full of (bad) advice and nonsense about Fair Use, such as this gem, "actually it because itunes "doesn't understand" fair use".
ADG
To be honest I never saw it. I saw he had posted it and when I went to watch it there was a message that it had been taken down due to copyright violation. Youtube took it down right away.
From what I understand he took the entire 8 minute opening bit from the Daily Show where they made fun of SOPA and made a case for fair use and added commentary showing how much fair use was in their bit.
Today, 04:42 PM
gideongallery
This message is hidden because gideongallery is on your ignore list.
You can't stop bumping this thread can you? lol
I've never seen anyone as stupid in my entire life.
Every time you bump the thread Aaron Jacques...you just bring more trouble to yourself. And more of your enemies are icq'ing and pm'ing to get all your information from all the people who now have it.
You really are desperate for attention aren't you? You need mental help.
I saw he had posted it and when I went to watch it there was a message that it had been taken down due to copyright violation. Youtube took it down right away.
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
So the dumb fucking pro-pirate Aaron Jacques comes on a PORN board and tries to prove that he can steal shit and call it "fair use" and YouTube yanks it down immediately for copyright violations!
So the dumb fucking pro-pirate Aaron Jacques comes on a PORN board and tries to prove that he can steal shit and call it "fair use" and YouTube yanks it down immediately for copyright violations!
In the warped mind of GG, filled as it is with twisted logic about what he is or is not entitled to profit off of however he wishes, he actually believes he won and made his argument by having YouTube shitcan his video.
I had not paid much attention to GG's mostly incoherent borderline schizo ramblings before, but reading a few of them in detail (and then comparing them to reality), helped confirm my initial suspicions about him.
Remember according to GG the mere fact that ANY site allows comments on an upload puts it under "fair use".
So in his world, you can upload the ENTIRE Avengers movie to Youtube, just put "I liked this movie" as a comment and BAM! according to GG that's fair use.
Aaron...be sure to get those toilets at @k1r@ really clean you fucking toilet bug.
Is this gonna get ugly, now? Huh? I hope not. Because I thought what we were here, racial differences notwithstanding, was just a couple of old friends. You know, just both of us Californians.
You have to realize that to a big time pornographer like Aaron Jacques he thinks he can do anything.
I guess YouTube bitch slapped him back to reality.
Just like he claimed to be a big shot and making a fortune with his "give it all away free" theories....
Then he got bitch slapped by reality again and we found out he's just an employee at a company. And he can't even make a web page. And he pretty much doesn't understand how the internet works...it took him almost 3 days of us hot linking images off his server for him to figure out he didn't have an index page on jacquesweb.com And then it took him another 24 hours to figure out how to put up an .htaccess file.
You know...stuff that any of us would have figured out within 5 seconds (IF we ever did anything dumb like leave a site wide open as he did)
I've worked with a lot of programmers. Aaron Jacques is NOT a programmer or anything else technical. If you guys had seen the insides of the folders on jacquesweb.com you would have laughed your asses off at all of his failed attempts and complete ineptitude of anything web related.
You have to realize that to a big time pornographer like Aaron Jacques he thinks he can do anything.
I guess YouTube bitch slapped him back to reality.
Just like he claimed to be a big shot and making a fortune with his "give it all away free" theories....
Then he got bitch slapped by reality again and we found out he's just an employee at a company. And he can't even make a web page. And he pretty much doesn't understand how the internet works...it took him almost 3 days of us hot linking images off his server for him to figure out he didn't have an index page on jacquesweb.com And then it took him another 24 hours to figure out how to put up an .htaccess file.
You know...stuff that any of us would have figured out within 5 seconds (IF we ever did anything dumb like leave a site wide open as he did)
I've worked with a lot of programmers. Aaron Jacques is NOT a programmer or anything else technical. If you guys had seen the insides of the folders on jacquesweb.com you would have laughed your asses off at all of his failed attempts and complete ineptitude of anything web related.
case solved? he really sucks at everything he does... well that and trolllolllolll
Hah-hah. gideon Aaron Jacques gallery claims to be a Microsoft developer at Akira.
He's probably the janitor. Here he is asking a question in 2008 about something he is SUPPOSED to be employed as an expert at and developer (at least that's the excuse he gave when I busted him for using Front Page and Expression and STILL not being able to make a webpage) : http://social.expression.microsoft.c...3-7acc0b1cdf1b
He wanted to know how to use a WYSIWYG to make an animated gif show up on a web page like the "ones you see on tv" BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
He is one television watching, piracy loving, pornography mogul motherfucker! lol
Hah-hah. gideon Aaron Jacques gallery claims to be a Microsoft developer at Akira.
He's probably the janitor. Here he is asking a question in 2008 about something he is SUPPOSED to be employed as an expert at and developer (at least that's the excuse he gave when I busted him for using Front Page and Expression and STILL not being able to make a webpage) : http://social.expression.microsoft.c...3-7acc0b1cdf1b
He wanted to know how to use a WYSIWYG to make an animated gif show up on a web page like the "ones you see on tv" BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
He is one television watching, piracy loving, pornography mogul motherfucker! lol
Champagne? I'm not up to speed on that...but as I understood it: If a bottle of champagne is NOT made in France it is labeled "Sparkling wine" So you might be a little bit off on that one.
no i know my facts, you should learn about these things... there are reasons why US copyrights are ignored.
from wikipedia:
The United States bans the use from all new U.S.-produced wines.[3] Only those that had approval to use the term on labels before 2006 may continue to use it and only when it is accompanied by the wine's actual origin (e.g., "California").[3] The majority of U.S.-produced sparkling wines do not use the term champagne on their labels [15] and some states, such as Oregon,[16] ban producers in their states from using the term.
thus, US manufacturers that were labeling their sparking wine as "champagne" are still allowed to, as long as they list their location.
no i know my facts, you should learn about these things... there are reasons why US copyrights are ignored.
from wikipedia:
thus, US manufacturers that were labeling their sparking wine as "champagne" are still allowed to, as long as they list their location.
I didn't look it up. All I know is what I see at the actual real-life liquor store when I go to buy champagne at New Years Eve. NONE of them say Champagne except French ones.
If you'd like to beat a dead horse I guess you could research it and find us one company and one brand that calls itself champagne that isn't from France. Knock yourself out.
As for "there are reasons US copyrights are ignored" WTF does that mean? And why should I "learn about these things" These "things" being champagne. lol I already TOLD you that I've never seen a bottle of champagne from anywhere but France. All the rest are labeled "sparkling wine"
Why should I need to "learn about these things"?
I didn't look it up. All I know is what I see at the actual real-life liquor store when I go to buy champagne at New Years Eve. NONE of them say Champagne except French ones.
If you'd like to beat a dead horse I guess you could research it and find us one company and one brand that calls itself champagne that isn't from France. Knock yourself out.
As for "there are reasons US copyrights are ignored" WTF does that mean? And why should I "learn about these things" These "things" being champagne. lol I already TOLD you that I've never seen a bottle of champagne from anywhere but France. All the rest are labeled "sparkling wine"
Why should I need to "learn about these things"?
I'm still gonna buy Dom or PJ at New Years.
Robbie strikes again. Every college kid knows Cook's or Corbel champagne.
Just use google images for those two.
Comment