Quote:
Originally Posted by Smut
If it's for commercial gain, it's not "Fair Use" any longer. It's infringement.
|
weird al proves that bullshit statement false
commercial gain does not automatically invalidate fair use the supreme court explictly said so.
Quote:
|
Plus, "Fair Use" only applies if it's a "Portion" of the work.
|
both timeshifting and format shifting prove this statement to be a bald face lie
Again the supreme court says so
Quote:
|
Anyone can bend the meaning of the law to their own will, but until you are a judge on a case, I don't believe you are qualified to publicly state what is or isn't the Law in any regard.
|
not me supreme court
and if you want to add canada supreme court
piracy tax turns piracy into a licensed transaction for any content which is entitled to claim a portion of the tax (valid contract = offer/acceptance/consideration)
and
violating geographic bans is legal because at the time of the infringement the content has a market value of zero (can not be bought).