|
Damian, the only thing "Landmark" about this decision is that it is the first (that I've heard of) to come down on that side of the "IP is sufficient to prove the user" question. Several other courts have ruled the other way and now this Judge has ruled this way.
There are now precedents on both sides of the issue and the Supreme Court hasn't dealt with this yet. May be many years before they do, if ever, and who knows which way they'll go.
All we have now are judicial rulings on both sides of the issue.
|