Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmycooper
They're not copying Met Art. They're trying to copy X-ART just like Met Art and Passion-HD have copied X-ART. I think they're all overestimating the importance that hardcore content and super high end equipment has played in X-ART's success. X-Art has done as well as it has more because of passion and vision. Seeing as those two elements cannot be duplicated, the copycat sites just come across as boring, generic sites that try to appeal to both hardcore and art nude surfers but fail at both. Well, at least that looks to be the case with SexArt and Passion-HD. The jury is still out on Babes. Personally, I think it looks cheesy. It was as if I could almost smell the scent of Drakkar Noir emanating from my laptop as I watched the trailer.
|
agreed, there will only be one X-Art, it's one guy's vision and talent - doesn't mean that the sites that try to emulate it will suck though. SexArt in my opinion will be a fail, it's the vision of a 69 year old director who created cable erotica in the 80's and 90's, i don't think it will find much of an audience on the web. Passion-HD i'm sure is making lots of money, it's nowhere near the quality of X-Art BUT the scenes are hotter than X-Art - because it's shot by people who know how to shoot hardcore sex.
As much as I admire X-Art's content I've watched a bunch of their scenes and it does nothing for me as jerkoff material. Hardcore should be raw - whether it's passionate or nasty and rough. Pierre Woodman is my porn hero. His casting videos in hotel rooms are real life, real sex. I also like Manuel Ferrara's Raw series - just him and a porn chick in a hotel room or her own home. Nobody else in the room, that's how you get real sex.