Kim Dotcom: The US Government is Wrong, Here?s Why

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gideongallery
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2003
    • 7082

    #1

    Kim Dotcom: The US Government is Wrong, Here?s Why

    http://torrentfreak.com/kim-dotcom-t...es-why-120326/

    it appears as if most of the "smoking guns" against mega upload are just like the "smoking guns" against youtube.

    http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/n...om-filings.ars

    “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
  • DEA
    So Fucking Banned
    • Oct 2004
    • 627

    #2
    ahh he will be ok in the end

    Comment

    • DamianJ
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Jul 2006
      • 15808

      #3
      I can't believe the RIAA fucked up!

      /sarcasm

      Comment

      • slapass
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Nov 2002
        • 14625

        #4
        The good news is that the damage to that industry is already done. Has anyone added back those features and started paying for traffic generated by user uploads to trademarked material?

        Comment

        • His Infernal Majesty
          Confirmed User
          • Jul 2004
          • 469

          #5
          Originally posted by slapass
          Has anyone added back those features and started paying for traffic generated by user uploads to trademarked material?
          Yes, it all went back to normal for the most part. Though, some of the filehosts are a least a bit more amenable to work together to protect content that is being reported.

          Comment

          • pimpmaster9000
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Dec 2011
            • 26730

            #6
            this is exactly what I was hoping for...an obvious pirate idiot who will rub a technicality in the face of the law and somehow get away....wind in the sails of SOPA/PIPA/ACTA...
            Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

            Comment

            • fris
              I have to go potty
              • Aug 2002
              • 55719

              #7
              well its an article on torrentfreak what do you expect, so they are bias in every way possible.
              Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.

              My Latest Theme

              Comment

              • raymor
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2002
                • 3745

                #8
                It'll be interesting to see if the facts line up work his claims.

                The Viacom vs. Youtube article is interesting because while the first half of the article makes clear Youtube was knowingly and deliberately profiting from large scale infringement, the second half says Viacom was uploading some of the videis it was complaining about. It sounds longer it would be an open an shut case for someone other than Viacom to sue Youtube - someone who wasn't uploading.
                For historical display only. This information is not current:
                support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
                Strongbox - The next generation in site security
                Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
                Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids

                Comment

                • ZeroHero
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 15336

                  #9
                  nothing new for me here ...

                  Comment

                  • CaptainHowdy
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 94031

                    #10
                    Just passing by ...

                    Comment

                    • gideongallery
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2003
                      • 7082

                      #11
                      Originally posted by raymor
                      It'll be interesting to see if the facts line up work his claims.

                      The Viacom vs. Youtube article is interesting because while the first half of the article makes clear Youtube was knowingly and deliberately profiting from large scale infringement, the second half says Viacom was uploading some of the videis it was complaining about. It sounds longer it would be an open an shut case for someone other than Viacom to sue Youtube - someone who wasn't uploading.
                      http://torrentfreak.com/entertainmen...upload-120326/
                      might have similar issues

                      “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                      Comment

                      • raymor
                        Confirmed User
                        • Oct 2002
                        • 3745

                        #12
                        Originally posted by gideongallery
                        Maybe. Having an attorney ask them to license promo videos and to sign a contract that would probably have them assume liability for infringement via their service isn't exactly a smoking gun, though. Big difference between talking about posting a trailer versus having whole feature movies stolen.
                        For historical display only. This information is not current:
                        support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
                        Strongbox - The next generation in site security
                        Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
                        Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids

                        Comment

                        • The Ghost
                          IslandDollars.com
                          • Oct 2004
                          • 12188

                          #13
                          If anything it's known who he is now. What he looks like and personal details. It only takes one person with a vendetta and means to make his life a living hell or worse.

                          He's going to be a target from here on out.
                          ISLAND DOLLARS
                          1000's of Exclusive TS scenes / Constant Updates
                          Best TS Network your surfers will ever join

                          Comment

                          • $5 submissions
                            I help you SUCCEED
                            • Nov 2003
                            • 32189

                            #14
                            Originally posted by gideongallery
                            http://torrentfreak.com/kim-dotcom-t...es-why-120326/

                            it appears as if most of the "smoking guns" against mega upload are just like the "smoking guns" against youtube.

                            http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/n...om-filings.ars
                            Looks legit, dude

                            Comment

                            • Captain Kawaii
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Oct 2007
                              • 6748

                              #15
                              They'll fuck him on the money laundering charges.... Besides that he still has to dodge the private security companies from Universal and friends... lol

                              Good luck to that whale hiding his blubber...

                              If anyone is stupid enough to think the DOJ have built their case on a single 50 cent song...I have a bridge I'd like you to buy...

                              Alicia Keys and Swizz Beatz going into receivership on their Manhattan digs in Feb indicate what they were about with Kim. They some broke ass bitches, or appear to be, at this point in time.

                              Comment

                              • gideongallery
                                Confirmed User
                                • Aug 2003
                                • 7082

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Captain Kawaii
                                They'll fuck him on the money laundering charges.... Besides that he still has to dodge the private security companies from Universal and friends... lol
                                the money laundering charges are because he tried to convert copyright infringement money into clean host ad revenue money.

                                Take away the underlying copyright infringement and then he is only guilty if turning clean hosting ad revenue money into clean host ad revenue money.

                                Good luck to that whale hiding his blubber...

                                If anyone is stupid enough to think the DOJ have built their case on a single 50 cent song...I have a bridge I'd like you to buy...

                                Alicia Keys and Swizz Beatz going into receivership on their Manhattan digs in Feb indicate what they were about with Kim. They some broke ass bitches, or appear to be, at this point in time.
                                replace viacomm with the doj and you have the exact same statement when i argued against the smoking gun in the youtube case.

                                With the screw up in the warrant a lot of evidence is now fruits of the poison tree.

                                “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                Comment

                                • Socks
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • May 2002
                                  • 8475

                                  #17
                                  Gideon sure spends a lot of time here considering he's a lawyer.

                                  He is a lawyer... right?

                                  Comment

                                  • porno jew
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Nov 2006
                                    • 10166

                                    #18
                                    yes with gideon consulting pro bono with his made up legal definitions i think dotcom has this one in the bag.

                                    Comment

                                    Working...