Britney sex tape?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • v4 media
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2005
    • 2934

    #1

    Britney sex tape?

    http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/showbi...%27/article.do


    Find this guy, and edit this vid to make him look better.. hehe.
  • Jimmy Rock
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2005
    • 3055

    #2
    Wheres the video
    Jimmy Rock | ICQ: 285 748 329
    [email protected]

    Comment

    • Casa Nova
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2007
      • 2867

      #3
      i think Kb has the tape...

      ICQ: 405 009 573


      Comment

      • DamageX
        Marketing & Strategy
        • Jun 2001
        • 14293

        #4
        Originally posted by Casa Nova
        i think Kb has the tape...
        KB is full of shit.
        Whitehat is for chumps

        If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!

        Comment

        • Rochard
          Jägermeister Test Pilot
          • Dec 2001
          • 75768

          #5
          I heard about this on the radio this morning.... I hope it's true!
          Herschel Savage
          Brooklyn, NY

          Comment

          • Brad
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2007
            • 2510

            #6
            Heard the rumors too. The guy apparently filmed it secretly. He's from Hawaii. I say who cares. I like porn just as much as the next guy. But after all of the "celebrity" sex tapes that I've seen I could care less. They are all boring (with the possible exception of 30-60 seconds of the Pam and Tom tape), not to mention Britney is not hot anymore and probably boring as fuck in the sack. All this adds up to "who gives a flying fuck"?
            Affiliate Manager/Media Buyer
            ICQ 376 978 529
            Skype: bradleyjwscott
            [email protected]

            Comment

            • RawAlex
              So Fucking Banned
              • Oct 2003
              • 9465

              #7
              Once again, unless Britney signs off a model release and provides 2257 documentation, it can't be easily used commercially. That she was apparently drunk and passed on somewhere on the tape would also suggest that she wasn't in condition to consent to filming (to fill the model release) and understand what it meant.

              Major ass lawsuit, and not very much upside on this one. Load it up on your chinese tube sites and call it even.

              Comment

              • Lykos
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Apr 2003
                • 31027

                #8
                I'd hit her

                Comment

                • v4 media
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 2934

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Adult Lounge - Brad
                  All this adds up to "who gives a flying fuck"?

                  It's all about the Benjamins...

                  Comment

                  • Matt Collins
                    Confirmed User
                    • May 2005
                    • 1060

                    #10
                    Britney still sells so I bet it would be a huge success...assuming there's a model release and 2257...

                    I'd love to see it!

                    Matt
                    Check out Globally Translated!-Translate your sites and join the global economy!

                    MattLaw -The law firm for webmasters and site owners!

                    ICQ: 254-829-586 Who is this Matt guy? Check out the Ambush Interview

                    Comment

                    • V_RocKs
                      Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 32467

                      #11
                      I knew she was a whore.

                      Comment

                      • Rochard
                        Jägermeister Test Pilot
                        • Dec 2001
                        • 75768

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RawAlex
                        Once again, unless Britney signs off a model release and provides 2257 documentation, it can't be easily used commercially. That she was apparently drunk and passed on somewhere on the tape would also suggest that she wasn't in condition to consent to filming (to fill the model release) and understand what it meant.

                        Major ass lawsuit, and not very much upside on this one. Load it up on your chinese tube sites and call it even.
                        Bullshit!

                        Do you really need a model release to use the content? Do you need to give consent? I don't think so. The contenet is always owned by the photographer because the photographer created the photo - not the people in it.

                        You don't really need 2257 - Everyone knows she's legal. Might foul you up in 2257 laws but that's gonna be the least of his problems....
                        Herschel Savage
                        Brooklyn, NY

                        Comment

                        • royaljelly2
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2007
                          • 1034

                          #13
                          Oh what ever and who cares? i'm tired of her.

                          Comment

                          • teg0
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jan 2006
                            • 4204

                            #14
                            I don't think i'd want to see a video of her unless it was age 18. Shes has been cute for the last 4 years without photoshop or make up.

                            Comment

                            • Az A Bay Bay
                              Confirmed User
                              • Sep 2007
                              • 1129

                              #15
                              ???? i dnt c anything????

                              Home of Ed Powers and america's next hot pornstar

                              Comment

                              • Quagmire
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jul 2005
                                • 6490

                                #16
                                There has got to be better fat amateur people fucking on video somewhere.

                                Comment

                                • Brad
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jan 2007
                                  • 2510

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Quagmire
                                  There has got to be better fat amateur people fucking on video somewhere.


                                  good point!
                                  Affiliate Manager/Media Buyer
                                  ICQ 376 978 529
                                  Skype: bradleyjwscott
                                  [email protected]

                                  Comment

                                  • hateman
                                    So Fucking Banned
                                    • Jul 2003
                                    • 1623

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by RawAlex
                                    Once again, unless Britney signs off a model release and provides 2257 documentation, it can't be easily used commercially.
                                    yes, because Paris signed a model release and provided 2257 docs

                                    moron.

                                    Comment

                                    • Hank_Heartland
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Sep 2002
                                      • 3987

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Rochard
                                      Bullshit!

                                      Do you really need a model release to use the content? Do you need to give consent? I don't think so. The contenet is always owned by the photographer because the photographer created the photo - not the people in it.

                                      You don't really need 2257 - Everyone knows she's legal. Might foul you up in 2257 laws but that's gonna be the least of his problems....
                                      Rochard,

                                      You are wrong on that one...It's called 'Right to Publicity' or something like that. A photog just can't take a stars pic for and use it for anything you want.

                                      Unless it is for news that is
                                      Icq = 459565429 AIM = butlerhankb http://stripperpins.com
                                      Twitter = @stripperpins Facebook = Stripperpins.com
                                      [email protected]

                                      Comment

                                      • peterk
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Aug 2007
                                        • 3529

                                        #20
                                        This tape doesn't exist
                                        Bogat mama ala cu loturi de trafic

                                        Comment

                                        • TheAmericanCannibal
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Dec 2006
                                          • 3088

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Rochard
                                          Bullshit!

                                          Do you really need a model release to use the content? Do you need to give consent? I don't think so. The contenet is always owned by the photographer because the photographer created the photo - not the people in it.

                                          You don't really need 2257 - Everyone knows she's legal. Might foul you up in 2257 laws but that's gonna be the least of his problems....
                                          Not true Richard-
                                          You should know this better than anyone.
                                          2257 along with two forms of Identification is NEEDED.
                                          Also a release stating she gives her consent to sell her likeness commercially.

                                          http://youtube.com/watch?v=xcLSjgH0b74

                                          This video may educate some

                                          Comment

                                          • OzMan
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Sep 2003
                                            • 9162

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by hateman
                                            yes, because Paris signed a model release and provided 2257 docs

                                            moron.
                                            I'm pretty sure I remember she did...eventually... at least on the first one...not sure on the storage stuff

                                            Comment

                                            • TheAmericanCannibal
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Dec 2006
                                              • 3088

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Hank_Heartland
                                              Rochard,

                                              You are wrong on that one...It's called 'Right to Publicity' or something like that. A photog just can't take a stars pic for and use it for anything you want.

                                              Unless it is for news that is



                                              Bingo

                                              Comment

                                              • ~Ray
                                                visit hardlinks.org
                                                • Jun 2003
                                                • 18361

                                                #24
                                                signup below and get your links up.

                                                (hit me up for "customs" )

                                                ~Ray
                                                icq 94994627
                                                Adult Backlinks for Adult Websites - Testimonials Available

                                                Comment

                                                • pudcat
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Mar 2003
                                                  • 1169

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Hank_Heartland
                                                  Rochard,
                                                  ...
                                                  Unless it is for news that is
                                                  SUBMIT YOUR BABE GALLERIES

                                                  PROMOTE YOUR BLOG HERE

                                                  always looking for hardlinks icq #207011694

                                                  Thunder-Ball.net, good for hardlink exchanges

                                                  Comment

                                                  • TheAmericanCannibal
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Dec 2006
                                                    • 3088

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by OzMan
                                                    I'm pretty sure I remember she did...eventually... at least on the first one...not sure on the storage stuff
                                                    There was no release on the storage stuff-
                                                    That's why the videos haven't seen the light of day....yet.

                                                    Although I know people who know some people who represent people that are involved with the lockers contents. I believe someday you WILL see some of that footage, I just don't think you'll see any nudity or sex

                                                    Comment

                                                    • gecko
                                                      ******
                                                      • Jun 2002
                                                      • 21846

                                                      #27
                                                      I'll believe it when I see it
                                                      [email protected]

                                                      Comment

                                                      Working...