Jailbait Rating System? I know controversy sells, but is this legal?

**SykkBoy** · 09-28-2007, 07:14 AM

Yikes
I wouldn't touch something like that with a 10 foot pole...

**Mutt** · 09-28-2007, 07:16 AM

new 2257 includes that type of NN content - owner of that site has no idea how old the girls in those pics really are since they are just candids he's grabbed from all over the web.

**LiveDose** · 09-28-2007, 07:16 AM

Fuck that is asking for trouble.

**JMM** · 09-28-2007, 07:17 AM

Well, besides the obvious 2257 issues, copyright issues and the fact that they are using those girls likeness commercially without consent, seems to me this would fall under Fling's recent announcement of abusive marketing practices.

**Spudman** · 09-28-2007, 07:28 AM

shit, those girls are defo too young, thats site is asking for shit!!

**teg0** · 09-28-2007, 07:33 AM

There are no nudes. Says pictures are just ones collected from facebook and myspace and stuff.

**Jet - BANNED FOR LIFE** · 09-28-2007, 07:34 AM

jailbait

**teg0** · 09-28-2007, 07:38 AM

if its an 2257 risk then you'd think facebook, myspace, and flicker would be in some shit.

**Darkhorse** · 09-28-2007, 07:39 AM

Ya I came across that site from another forum a few weeks back, they might be jailbait but fuck there are some hotties there hope to see a few of them doing a solo girl site somewhere down the track.

**tony286** · 09-28-2007, 07:40 AM

Originally posted by teg0

if its an 2257 risk then you'd think facebook, myspace, and flicker would be in some shit.

True but they have a lot of money to fight where I doubt the owner of she jailbait has the same war chest. Remember ggw, he actually shot underage girls and for not having 2257 he got a fine, we would all be sitting in jail for a long time.

**RawAlex** · 09-28-2007, 07:43 AM

With the new 2257, it doesn't matter where the images come from and it doesn't matter if they are NN... there are crotch shots and string bikinis in there, which is enough to trigger 2257 in it's current version.

I think the idea is jailbait.

**pornask** · 09-28-2007, 07:43 AM

Oh, fuck me with a chain saw...

**RevSand** · 09-28-2007, 09:06 AM

Thank myspace for that site...

**CyberHustler** · 09-28-2007, 09:22 AM

Originally posted by pornask

Oh, fuck me with a chain saw...

**Mutt** · 09-28-2007, 09:24 AM

myspace, facebook, OneModelPlace, ModelMayhem etc - they all are in violation of 2257 but the government will never call them on it. 2257 is just an anti-pornographer law - nothing to do with child porn.

**DaddyHalbucks** · 09-28-2007, 09:30 AM

Originally posted by Mutt

myspace, facebook, OneModelPlace, ModelMayhem etc - they all are in violation of 2257 but the government will never call them on it. 2257 is just an anti-pornographer law - nothing to do with child porn.

How so? 2257 regulates sexually explicit material. Doesn't MySpace prohibit sexually explicit content?

**modF** · 09-28-2007, 09:41 AM

Originally posted by teg0

if its an 2257 risk then you'd think facebook, myspace, and flicker would be in some shit.

Not if the people posting on facebook, myspace, and flicker are posting their own pics.

**Mutt** · 09-28-2007, 10:23 AM

Originally posted by modF

Not if the people posting on facebook, myspace, and flicker are posting their own pics.

not true - where in 2257 is there any language that exempts user submitted content?

**Scott McD** · 09-28-2007, 10:25 AM

They all look like jailbait to me...

**Mutt** · 09-28-2007, 10:26 AM

Originally posted by DaddyHalbucks

How so? 2257 regulates sexually explicit material. Doesn't MySpace prohibit sexually explicit content?

2257 is now much broader in scope - it specifically mentions NN content that it tittilating or even where the model appears to be 'coy' falls under 2257 and that includes a ton of what's on myspace facebook etc.

it's moot though - the government has no interest in myspace, facebook et al - their target is this industry and this industry alone.

**SykkBoy** · 09-28-2007, 10:29 AM

I'd assume the fact they have adult advertising (fling) on the site makes it much more different than myspace or facebook having the same images...

D · 09-28-2007, 10:29 AM

Originally posted by JMM

Well, besides the obvious 2257 issues, copyright issues and the fact that they are using those girls likeness commercially without consent, seems to me this would fall under Fling's recent announcement of abusive marketing practices.

You'd think so...

But this isn't the only site of that nature I've seen directing the majority of its traffic to Fling.

One even has nudity scattered throughout. :-/

**martinsc** · 09-28-2007, 10:39 AM

... someone is asking for trouble.... i think....

**teg0** · 09-28-2007, 10:47 AM

Originally posted by SykkBoy2

I'd assume the fact they have adult advertising (fling) on the site makes it much more different than myspace or facebook having the same images...

myspace runs fling ads don't they? Someone posted a screen shot of it on here last week.

**teg0** · 09-28-2007, 10:49 AM

These ones are by far worse. These ones are really porn oriented, where as she jailbait looks more mainstream.

http://www.jailbaitgallery.com
http://www.youngteensdaily.com

**woj** · 09-28-2007, 10:50 AM

Originally posted by SykkBoy2

Yikes
I wouldn't touch something like that with a 10 foot pole...

yea, no kidding

**Andy Servers4Less** · 09-28-2007, 10:57 AM

Originally posted by RevSand

Thank myspace for that site...

100% correct.

**Lifer** · 09-28-2007, 11:11 AM

Originally posted by Scott McD

They all look like jailbait to me...

More or less

Jailbait Rating System? I know controversy sells, but is this legal?

Jailbait Rating System? I know controversy sells, but is this legal?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment