Quote:
Originally Posted by Inter-Sex
Yes I'd, besides that it is cheap, it's also non exclusive.  (What may make the set even more expensive.) |
Exclusive content is different thing. Of course that would be cheap if it was exclusive. Too cheap.
But we are speaking about not exclusive. Do people pay 35$ for solo photo sets non exclusively often? If they do often it may be cheap, but do they?
From what I see on this forum average webmaster would say its worth 10$ or something. So 35$ is way more than that.