View Single Post
Old 02-05-2012, 02:12 PM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by porno jew View Post
you left out the important part.

It's a big move against EMI-owned Capitol, and the fellow major labels that it represents. But Google has a lot riding on cloud computing, which makes a decision over cloud-based digital resale an important matter. But hearing the case - and potentially losing it - is exactly the opposite of what the major labels want. Which is why Capitol Records quickly moved to deny Google the ability to insinuate itself into the action.
On Thursday, a judge agreed, and told Google to mind its own business. The parties can duke it out themselves, thank you very much. Request, DENIED.


http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/perm...2/120201redigi

and you left out a huge part

Quote:
On Wednesday, the search giant moved to block an attempt by Capitol to dismiss the entire case (in legalese, through an attempted amicus curiae filing), based on important principles related to cloud computing.
your not talking about the original friends of the court filing

your talking about google attempt to force capital vs redigi to be heard after capital said "oh fuck google friends filing really screws us, we just want to drop the case".

The judge rightfully so, said if redigi doesn't want to take the defacto win, and fight it for absolute clarification they are the ones who get to decide not google.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote