Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
read the ruling
the link is in the very first post
nuff said.
|
Try and check the entire ruling, the following legal amendments / notes and guidelines
Reproduction is fine, add distribution/time morphing / whatever you wish to call it and it's conspiracy charges. Teach others how to do it and it's conspiracy to commit racketeering.
Have you ever been in a court before ? It sounds like you think it's 1 way communications.
You would also know it's not sufficient to just quote a case you have to quote the similarity / reference point used, unlike on TV all judges are not "very well familiar with case x"
Also you should read more about 18 U.S.C. § 2318, looks like it should be useful too. The funny part about that one is actually that you wouldn't need to be found guilty in copyright infringement but instead it's counterfeit labels, packaging and / or documentation. IE: you produced a copy of your legally obtained software, music to bypass 18 U.S.C. § 2314, now you are instead trafficking counterfeit/illicit labels and packaging. It's easy to build on the charges here (file names, digital signatures, COPYRIGHT NOTICE, CREDITS TO).
That's actually interested as it appears to cover a lot of the "safe harbors"