Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
It would depend on how you defined a bogus complaint. Let me give you an example and see what you think.
In this example I find a site using my content without my permission. I do my due diligence and I legitimately feel like they are violating my copyright. So I file a DMCA. The site owner responds to it and explains to me why they are not violating my copyright. I disagree and we end up in court. The court sides with the site. I honestly felt they were violating my copyright, but the court didn't agree with me.
In your opinion is that a bogus claim?
|
seriously moron do you know the difference between SOPA rogue site complaint and a single DMCA complaint.
I have told you a 13 times already that i want the law to be balanced
actual damages= actual damages counter suit
statutory damages = statutory damages counter suit
DMCA takedown = lose the copyright on the content you claimed was infringed
SOPA wipe them off the face of the internet = wipe out all your copyrights
don't want the maximum penalties don't jump straight to the censoring options.