View Single Post
Old 01-19-2012, 01:25 PM  
signupdamnit
Confirmed User
 
signupdamnit's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sly View Post
Few thought it was "acceptable" but acknowledged that there was a risk. There is a risk with any decision you make in business. I've seen many CCBill programs fold. Sure, the affiliate will not lose whatever money is owed, but they still lose out on all of their time and money invested on promotions.
All of this is true but there is more risk with a smaller program handling their own payouts. That's not to say that it isn't ever worth it to take the additional risk.

Allison from TB made a post on that topic which I found to be rather refreshing at the time even though it was mostly neutral:
https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=18497136&postcount=491

This is sort of what I am talking about. In the old days it used to be more common to see people from large programs actively supporting affiliates and others who just got screwed. Sometimes this would help to get affiliates their money in the end because the crooks would think twice about what they were doing and the possible consequences.
signupdamnit is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote