A Question about The Thing (2012)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ClickCastX
    X10 Revenue
    • Jul 2011
    • 405

    #1

    A Question about The Thing (2012)

    I'm going to watch it with a bunch of friends later today. I was a fan of the Eighties remake by John Carpenter, but I wasn't sure of this one. To those who saw it, is it another retread of the Carpenter movie, or is it something completely new? How's the creature? And do you think I should just skip it and just watch porn?


    https://www.x10revenue.com
    [email protected]
    skype: vod.support
  • Operator
    So Fucking Banned
    • May 2009
    • 2419

    #2
    Splurge

    Comment

    • jollyperv
      Confirmed User
      • Nov 2001
      • 3927

      #3
      The Thing from Carpenter is SO FUCKING GOOD

      Comment

      • AllAboutCams
        Femcams.com
        • Jul 2011
        • 12234

        #4
        if you like the original like i do dont watch the new one its not very good
        Binance - Blockchain and Crypto Asset Exchange
        Chaturbate make money in cams

        Comment

        • bronco67
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Dec 2006
          • 29026

          #5
          The only question I have, and I really hope someone can explain this to me is ---

          If the transformation is such a bloody, gooey, disgusting event, how does the clone get clean, perfect clothes? Wouldn't they get ripped to shit and there would just be a blooody, naked person running around trying to fool everyone?

          The only thing I can think of is that the Thing knows what it's host knows, so it can go to their locker and get some un-bloody pants and a shirt. Clothes come from something organic, but they don't live and breathe -- so I think replicating the clothes is unlikely.

          Concerning the movie, as big fan of the original(who isn't) I thought it wasn't great -- but it was better than I expected.
          Last edited by bronco67; 01-17-2012, 05:54 AM.

          Comment

          • BladeZ
            So Fucking Banned
            • Mar 2004
            • 272

            #6
            The original version is from 1951,not so gory,but the suspense is much better.The last one is entertaining at most.But each his own taste.

            Comment

            • Operator
              So Fucking Banned
              • May 2009
              • 2419

              #7
              I stand by Wes Craven

              Comment

              • seeandsee
                Check SIG!
                • Mar 2006
                • 50945

                #8
                it's more about stuff before original story line
                BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

                Contact here

                Comment

                • Hentaikid
                  Confirmed User
                  • Nov 2002
                  • 1250

                  #9
                  It doesn't replicate the shape it infests and takes over the original body that's already wearing clothes.

                  The new one is supposed to be a prequel, showing what happens in the Norwegian camp which is kinda dumb because we know they all die except two and then get shot by the Americans at the start of the next movie :/

                  Read The Things by Peter Watts if you liked the 80s movie, it's a retelling of the film from the point of view of the creature. Available here

                  Comment

                  • bronco67
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 29026

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Hentaikid
                    It doesn't replicate the shape it infests and takes over the original body that's already wearing clothes.

                    The new one is supposed to be a prequel, showing what happens in the Norwegian camp which is kinda dumb because we know they all die except two and then get shot by the Americans at the start of the next movie :/
                    Okay. But it rips through clothes and bleeds like a stuck pig. Why are the clothes clean and in perfect condition?

                    Comment

                    • Phoenix
                      BACON BACON BACON
                      • Nov 2002
                      • 35475

                      #11
                      the sci fi short story was pretty cool...it was written from the perspective of the alien
                      Telegram PhoenixBrad
                      https://quantads.io

                      Comment

                      • John-ACWM
                        Work Work Work
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 20060

                        #12
                        I'd give it a try and see for myself. Don't think it is better than the original though.

                        Comment

                        • Grapesoda
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 46234

                          #13
                          Originally posted by ClickCastX
                          I'm going to watch it with a bunch of friends later today. I was a fan of the Eighties remake by John Carpenter, but I wasn't sure of this one. To those who saw it, is it another retread of the Carpenter movie, or is it something completely new? How's the creature? And do you think I should just skip it and just watch porn?

                          retread carpenter????

                          Comment

                          • anexsia
                            Confirmed User
                            • May 2010
                            • 5735

                            #14
                            I'm a big fan of the original and I thought the new prequel was OKAY...some of the cgi effects were pretty corny but it's a decent movie to pass time with. Doesn't hold a candle to the original The Thing though.

                            Comment

                            • CaptainHowdy
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Dec 2004
                              • 94050

                              #15
                              I'd stay clear from it ...

                              Comment

                              • 2MuchMark
                                Mark of 2Much.net
                                • Aug 2004
                                • 50932

                                #16
                                I loved John Carpenter's version. The suspense was great and the effects were fan-freaking-tastic. The FX even hold up even today.

                                John Carpenter has 2 other movies you should see : THEY LIVE and PRINCE OF DARKNESS. Both are low budget and non-gory, but they are high on suspense. "RED EYE" is also worth mentioning.




                                (Stupid trailer but great movie)


                                (Good trailer but too long and gives away too much. Don't watch it unless you need to)
                                Last edited by 2MuchMark; 01-18-2012, 07:53 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...