Legal Question: Vanessa Hudgens' Nude Photos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FredIsMe
    So Fucking Banned
    • Dec 2004
    • 2406

    #1

    Legal Question: Vanessa Hudgens' Nude Photos

    I'm curious to know my rights in the following matter.

    I have images of Vanessa Hudgens nude on a site of mine. Yesterday my server provider receives a DCMA notice. In summary they say I have to take them down or I'll be taken to court.

    I live in Canada, I am hotlinking the images from a image host in the UK, and my server is in the USA. Neither Canada nor the UK have DCMA, I believe.

    What can happen? Can legal action be taken against me? Can my server be shutdown?

    Thanks
  • divine116
    Confirmed User
    • May 2007
    • 1152

    #2
    its better to go to court to prove that your innocent and besides your not the one who provide and upload that photo!
    Sexy Woman Upskirt Voyeur Web Developing Affordable SEO Services

    Comment

    • gooddomains
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Jul 2003
      • 10127

      #3
      keep them up, they are surely public domain and no one can request that you follow any laws that do not even apply to your country

      Comment

      • fris
        I have to go potty
        • Aug 2002
        • 55785

        #4
        even linking to it, i know fleshbot had some sort of issue when they were only linking to the colin farel sex tape
        Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.


        Totally Free Templates

        Comment

        • fusionx
          Confirmed User
          • Nov 2003
          • 4618

          #5
          Your server is in the USA. The hosting company could shut you down. You could be taken to court.

          Comment

          • Steve Awesome
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2007
            • 1575

            #6
            They (Disney) are going to spend a lot of money to keep these out of the public eye.

            Comment

            • cherrylula
              lol
              • Jan 2002
              • 15969

              #7
              Originally posted by Steve Awesome
              They (Disney) are going to spend a lot of money to keep these out of the public eye.
              More like they are going to spend a lot of money to keep it in the headlines. Legal action always works, and builds a lot of hype for the model.

              At this point in internet and entertainment history, if people still think all these leaked nudies are coincidence, the joke is on you.

              Comment

              • Grapesoda
                So Fucking Banned
                • Jul 2003
                • 46234

                #8
                Originally posted by FredIsMe
                I'm curious to know my rights in the following matter.

                I have images of Vanessa Hudgens nude on a site of mine. Yesterday my server provider receives a DCMA notice. In summary they say I have to take them down or I'll be taken to court.

                I live in Canada, I am hotlinking the images from a image host in the UK, and my server is in the USA. Neither Canada nor the UK have DCMA, I believe.

                What can happen? Can legal action be taken against me? Can my server be shutdown?

                Thanks
                why put yourself through a bunch of hostile bullshit? are you going to make $xxxx.xx. I would just drop the images and go onto something profitable. leave the grandstanding to someone else.

                Comment

                • RawAlex
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 9465

                  #9
                  Fredisme: You actually have a bigger problem that you haven't faced yet: Without proof of the date of production, you have no way to know if the image is or isn't CP. Being in Canada, you need to know that publishing CP (even linking to another server) puts you at risk.

                  Drop it like a flaming pile of pooh. Run. Get rid of the image, and help them out by showing their where you are linking the image from, so they can go after them as well. Like bm bradley says, unless you are making an assload of money off of this, why the fuck would you even consider anything other than giving in right away?

                  Comment

                  • Grapesoda
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 46234

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RawAlex
                    Fredisme: You actually have a bigger problem that you haven't faced yet: Without proof of the date of production, you have no way to know if the image is or isn't CP. Being in Canada, you need to know that publishing CP (even linking to another server) puts you at risk.

                    Drop it like a flaming pile of pooh. Run. Get rid of the image, and help them out by showing their where you are linking the image from, so they can go after them as well. Like bm bradley says, unless you are making an assload of money off of this, why the fuck would you even consider anything other than giving in right away?
                    there is no sexual content to the image. 2257 doesn't really apply

                    Comment

                    • RawAlex
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 9465

                      #11
                      bm bradley, you need to rethink that and catch up with the new laws... nudity is MORE than enough now (you could be required to have 2257 for full clothed models under certain circumstances). The image is a sexual image of a completely nude teen showing off her tits and pussy for the camera. That needs a model release and proof of age.

                      Comment

                      Working...