Nude photo emerges of 'High School Musical' star

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zebra
    Banned from Kimmy's couch
    • Oct 2001
    • 5091

    #1

    Nude photo emerges of 'High School Musical' star

    OK, who has the goods?

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/0....ap/index.html
    Old School
  • The Duck
    Adult Content Provider
    • May 2005
    • 18243

    #2
    Sig spotty
    Skype Horusmaia
    ICQ 41555245
    Email [email protected]

    Comment

    • stev0
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2003
      • 6801

      #3
      http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/20...ens-naked.html

      Comment

      • Enzyme
        Registered User
        • Apr 2006
        • 7

        #4
        Apparently I can't post the link to the site because I don't have 30 posts.

        It is located at
        websugarDOTcom/2007/09/07/vanessa-hudgens-naked.html

        Comment

        • GooSearch
          Confirmed User
          • Oct 2006
          • 2538

          #5
          http://restricteddomain.com/2007/09/...musical-naked/

          i guess there is a bunch of them out there
          GooSearch Real Text Ads Without The Drama
          Coming Back Bigger and Better Then Ever

          Comment

          • RawAlex
            So Fucking Banned
            • Oct 2003
            • 9465

            #6
            Interesting question for all those posting these things... how old is she now? How old was she then? She isn't even 19 at this point (december) so unless that picture was taken in the last 6 months, it is likely CP.

            Comment

            • Dollarmansteve
              Confirmed User
              • May 2005
              • 2849

              #7
              Originally posted by RawAlex
              Interesting question for all those posting these things... how old is she now? How old was she then? She isn't even 19 at this point (december) so unless that picture was taken in the last 6 months, it is likely CP.
              unlikely. How long have you had your interweb police badge?
              I died.

              Comment

              • Enzyme
                Registered User
                • Apr 2006
                • 7

                #8
                She's 18.

                Comment

                • Brad
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 2510

                  #9
                  Seen it, sucks to be here. what a dumb ass she is for admitting that it was her in the picture.
                  Affiliate Manager/Media Buyer
                  ICQ 376 978 529
                  Skype: bradleyjwscott
                  [email protected]

                  Comment

                  • RawAlex
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 9465

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                    unlikely. How long have you had your interweb police badge?
                    How long have you been an asshole?

                    The question is there: new 2257 rules. Everyone is out there posting a nude picture of a girl who is just barely 18 now, and the picture was taken at some point in the past. Does anyone have any proof of age? model release? Date of production? With the new 2257 rules, it is all needed to support the image.

                    Comment

                    • Brother Bilo
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 4193

                      #11
                      It's good for her. She's too hot for Disney channel anyways, not she'll be able to get her big girl on and start making real movies.

                      Comment

                      • pornguy
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Mar 2003
                        • 62910

                        #12
                        Shes pretty cute.

                        Who is she?
                        PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

                        AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
                        TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

                        Comment

                        • selena
                          Confirmed User
                          • Aug 2004
                          • 7995

                          #13
                          Damnit, I was hoping they were pics of the male lead in that movie.
                          ~
                          Doer of Things at
                          MetArtMoney
                          Where Flawless Beauty Meets Art
                          ~The MetArt Network ~
                          selena.delgado9

                          Comment

                          • BradM
                            Confirmed User
                            • Dec 2003
                            • 3397

                            #14
                            Originally posted by RawAlex
                            How long have you been an asshole?

                            The question is there: new 2257 rules. Everyone is out there posting a nude picture of a girl who is just barely 18 now, and the picture was taken at some point in the past. Does anyone have any proof of age? model release? Date of production? With the new 2257 rules, it is all needed to support the image.
                            It's on 100,000 blogs now. Do you really think anyone cares?

                            Comment

                            • jimthefiend
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Oct 2003
                              • 18889

                              #15
                              Originally posted by RawAlex
                              The question is there: new 2257 rules. Everyone is out there posting a nude picture of a girl who is just barely 18 now, and the picture was taken at some point in the past. Does anyone have any proof of age? model release? Date of production? With the new 2257 rules, it is all needed to support the image.


                              As much as I hate to, I am forced to agree with you on that. Imma laugh my ass off if she was 17 in that pic.

                              People who make $ off that kind of celeb shit are only a cunt hair less scummy than cp people imho anyway. I've always said that.
                              Last edited by jimthefiend; 09-07-2007, 09:01 AM.

                              Comment

                              • RawAlex
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Oct 2003
                                • 9465

                                #16
                                BradM, it's okay, all the Juggcash content is on the torrents, so I guess it's okay to steal.

                                Comment

                                • Dollarmansteve
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • May 2005
                                  • 2849

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by RawAlex
                                  How long have you been an asshole?

                                  The question is there: new 2257 rules. Everyone is out there posting a nude picture of a girl who is just barely 18 now, and the picture was taken at some point in the past. Does anyone have any proof of age? model release? Date of production? With the new 2257 rules, it is all needed to support the image.
                                  Unless you work for the FBI, why do you care about other people's potential 2257 problems?
                                  I died.

                                  Comment

                                  • jimthefiend
                                    So Fucking Banned
                                    • Oct 2003
                                    • 18889

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                                    Unless you work for the FBI, why do you care about other people's potential 2257 problems?
                                    Dude come on.


                                    "Other peoples problems (sic)" are the reason we're slowly being legislated out of existence. We need MORE people minding each others business.
                                    Last edited by jimthefiend; 09-07-2007, 09:06 AM.

                                    Comment

                                    • KimJI
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • May 2007
                                      • 1839

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                                      Unless you work for the FBI, why do you care about other people's potential 2257 problems?
                                      Maybe because we are the only one that can keep this industry clean. And following the 2257 rules are one of the things that have to be done unless we want to be hit with something harder.
                                      Trafficadept | Best traffic I have ever tested | web "@t" cuul.org

                                      Comment

                                      • Dollarmansteve
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • May 2005
                                        • 2849

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by jimthefiend
                                        Dude come on.


                                        "Other peoples problems (sic)" are the reason we're slowly being legislated out of existence. We need MORE people minding each others business.
                                        Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't 2257 apply to 'sexually explicit' content? How would this image be considered sexually explicit? A naked body is explicit? Is there a hidden dildo I'm not seeing?
                                        I died.

                                        Comment

                                        • Dollarmansteve
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • May 2005
                                          • 2849

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by KimJI
                                          Maybe because we are the only one that can keep this industry clean. And following the 2257 rules are one of the things that have to be done unless we want to be hit with something harder.
                                          I agree with what you're saying, but I think the discussion in misplaced with regards to this particular image.
                                          I died.

                                          Comment

                                          • jimthefiend
                                            So Fucking Banned
                                            • Oct 2003
                                            • 18889

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                                            Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't 2257 apply to 'sexually explicit' content? How would this image be considered sexually explicit? A naked body is explicit? Is there a hidden dildo I'm not seeing?
                                            **sigh**

                                            Comment

                                            • Dollarmansteve
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • May 2005
                                              • 2849

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by jimthefiend
                                              **sigh**
                                              double **sigh** . see my post above.
                                              I died.

                                              Comment

                                              • jimthefiend
                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                • Oct 2003
                                                • 18889

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                                                double **sigh** . see my post above.
                                                How long have you been in this fucking industry again?


                                                (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), ?sexually explicit conduct? means actual or simulated?
                                                (i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
                                                (ii) bestiality;
                                                (iii) masturbation;
                                                (iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
                                                (v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

                                                Comment

                                                • WarChild
                                                  Let slip the dogs of war.
                                                  • Jan 2003
                                                  • 17263

                                                  #25
                                                  Does Raw Alex +EVER+ shut up or is it just a constant storm of tears from that guy?
                                                  .

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Dollarmansteve
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • May 2005
                                                    • 2849

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by jimthefiend
                                                    How long have you been in this fucking industry again?


                                                    (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), ?sexually explicit conduct? means actual or simulated?
                                                    (i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
                                                    (ii) bestiality;
                                                    (iii) masturbation;
                                                    (iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
                                                    (v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;
                                                    lascivious

                                                    1. inclined to lustfulness; wanton; lewd: a lascivious, girl-chasing old man.
                                                    2. arousing sexual desire: lascivious photographs.
                                                    3. indicating sexual interest or expressive of lust or lewdness: a lascivious gesture.

                                                    Debatable. Anyway - like I said above, I think this is a misplaced discussion. Everytime Lindsay Lohan flashes her tits or hoo-ha there's gonna be 2257 docs? please.

                                                    Let's police our industry - the porn industry - and not every single nude celebrity image in the internet.
                                                    I died.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • jimthefiend
                                                      So Fucking Banned
                                                      • Oct 2003
                                                      • 18889

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by WarChild
                                                      Does Raw Alex +EVER+ shut up or is it just a constant storm of tears from that guy?
                                                      I fucking LOATHE Alex, but he brought up a valid point.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • KimJI
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • May 2007
                                                        • 1839

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                                                        I agree with what you're saying, but I think the discussion in misplaced with regards to this particular image.
                                                        I don't think so. If it was up to me, people that post other peoples nude pictures online should be prosecuted for posting content with no license and slander.

                                                        Imagine what it does to a 18 year old girl, to have her nude pictures distributed worldwide. Why is that OK? Just because she is a star, why do people think its OK to try and ruin her like this?

                                                        If she was a porn star it could be defended, but this is a 18 year old girl that preform on the Disney Channel. This is just plain WRONG.
                                                        Trafficadept | Best traffic I have ever tested | web "@t" cuul.org

                                                        Comment

                                                        • jimthefiend
                                                          So Fucking Banned
                                                          • Oct 2003
                                                          • 18889

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                                                          lascivious

                                                          Debatable. Anyway - like I said above, I think this is a misplaced discussion. Everytime Lindsay Lohan flashes her tits or hoo-ha there's gonna be 2257 docs? please.

                                                          You're preaching to the choir, I'm just making the point. And yes, if you follow the letter of the law: If Lohan does it deliberately with the intent to arouse or gain attention of a sexual nature from it, anyone who hosts the image needs docs.

                                                          It's that simple man.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Dollarmansteve
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • May 2005
                                                            • 2849

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by jimthefiend
                                                            You're preaching to the choir, I'm just making the point. And yes, if you follow the letter of the law: If Lohan does it deliberately with the intent to arouse or gain attention of a sexual nature from it, anyone who hosts the image needs docs.

                                                            It's that simple man.
                                                            The letter of the law is only valid in so much as it is enforced. If the FBI starts enforcing 2257 on paparazzi photos and bloggers, then I would say that the FBI has some fucked up priorities

                                                            I'll re-iterate my statement that a 2257 discussion in this thread, about this photo, is misplaced and a waste of time and energy. We all know RawAlex just likes to stick his nose in and make know-it-all, internet-police type comments whenever he can.
                                                            I died.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • jimthefiend
                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                              • Oct 2003
                                                              • 18889

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                                                              We all know RawAlex just likes to stick his nose in and make know-it-all, internet-police type comments whenever he can.
                                                              I agree with you on that at any rate.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • jimthefiend
                                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                                • Oct 2003
                                                                • 18889

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by KimJI
                                                                If she was a porn star it could be defended, but this is a 18 year old girl that preform on the Disney Channel. This is just plain WRONG.
                                                                Exactly. Whoever leaked that needs to be shot.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • JP-pornshooter
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Sep 2006
                                                                  • 4007

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by GooSearch
                                                                  http://restricteddomain.com/2007/09/...musical-naked/

                                                                  i guess there is a bunch of them out there
                                                                  nice.. looks like she took it herself, i wonder why ? she has a little bush going on, i wonder if that is making a come back amongst the young ones..
                                                                  quality looks like phone camera..and it is def not sexual explicit so no worry on 2257.
                                                                  "Obscenity is whatever gives the Judge an erection." -- Author Unknown

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • jimthefiend
                                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                                    • Oct 2003
                                                                    • 18889

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by JP-pornshooter
                                                                    and it is def not sexual explicit so no worry on 2257.
                                                                    And this from a producer.



                                                                    Jesus Christ.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • JP-pornshooter
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Sep 2006
                                                                      • 4007

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by KimJI
                                                                      I don't think so. If it was up to me, people that post other peoples nude pictures online should be prosecuted for posting content with no license and slander.

                                                                      Imagine what it does to a 18 year old girl, to have her nude pictures distributed worldwide. Why is that OK? Just because she is a star, why do people think its OK to try and ruin her like this?

                                                                      If she was a porn star it could be defended, but this is a 18 year old girl that preform on the Disney Channel. This is just plain WRONG.
                                                                      lesson learned = do not take any nude pics, especially if you are a cute 18 yo star of the biggest teenage movie in recent years.
                                                                      "Obscenity is whatever gives the Judge an erection." -- Author Unknown

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • MaDalton
                                                                        I am Amazing Content!
                                                                        • Feb 2004
                                                                        • 39861

                                                                        #36
                                                                        i was in switzerland last weekend, 16 year old prostitutes are legal there. and now?
                                                                        AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                                                                        Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                                                                        Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                                                                        Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • WarChild
                                                                          Let slip the dogs of war.
                                                                          • Jan 2003
                                                                          • 17263

                                                                          #37
                                                                          It's not CP automatically because there's nudity. For example, I believe the girl in American Beauty is underage, and she's shown half naked, but that isn't CP.

                                                                          As for 2257, maybe the poster is from somewhere outside your great union and simply doesn't give a fuck about your 2257 laws? Could happen, you know.
                                                                          .

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • BradM
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Dec 2003
                                                                            • 3397

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by RawAlex
                                                                            BradM, it's okay, all the Juggcash content is on the torrents, so I guess it's okay to steal.
                                                                            Why would I care if juggcash is all over torrents? That's their responsibility.

                                                                            Plus they have good content, saves me from buying a membership.

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Donfoolio
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Mar 2006
                                                                              • 963

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by jimthefiend
                                                                              Dude come on.


                                                                              "Other peoples problems (sic)" are the reason we're slowly being legislated out of existence. We need MORE people minding each others business.
                                                                              I totally agree here. I don't want to and never will mind others business, but it is shit like this that will only hurt us all in the long run, and honestly that slag is not even hot imo
                                                                              Promote SipSap escort search

                                                                              ICQ: 227853047

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • WarChild
                                                                                Let slip the dogs of war.
                                                                                • Jan 2003
                                                                                • 17263

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by jimthefiend
                                                                                You're preaching to the choir, I'm just making the point. And yes, if you follow the letter of the law: If Lohan does it deliberately with the intent to arouse or gain attention of a sexual nature from it, anyone who hosts the image needs docs.

                                                                                It's that simple man.
                                                                                Anyone in America, that is.
                                                                                .

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • KimJI
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • May 2007
                                                                                  • 1839

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by JP-pornshooter
                                                                                  lesson learned = do not take any nude pics, especially if you are a cute 18 yo star of the biggest teenage movie in recent years.
                                                                                  A 18 year old girl that takes pictures of herself - maybe to send to her boyfriend or something - do not under any circumstances need "to learn a lesson". I cant believe any sane mind can think like that. Your point of view disgusts me.
                                                                                  Trafficadept | Best traffic I have ever tested | web "@t" cuul.org

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • jimthefiend
                                                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                                                    • Oct 2003
                                                                                    • 18889

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by Donfoolio
                                                                                    I totally agree here. I don't want to and never will mind others business, but it is shit like this that will only hurt us all in the long run, and honestly that slag is not even hot imo
                                                                                    Only people who find that sexy, are well... You know.

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • solomonYBM
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Aug 2007
                                                                                      • 145

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      too bad so sad...
                                                                                      this is why you dont let your boyfriend film you at a young age
                                                                                      High Volume Video Encoding | Prepaid Adult Website Access | Porn Photo Comics

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • FelixFlow
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Nov 2004
                                                                                        • 2779

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        she needs to shave her snatch!!!



                                                                                        ICQ: 643 339 687

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • MrPinks
                                                                                          Registered User
                                                                                          • Oct 2003
                                                                                          • 1767

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Exactly! A lot of people need to get their heads out of the sand when it comes to NEW 2257 regulations and the Adam Walsh Act. If a photo even displays "sexual coyness" you are required to have docs on hand. Either a lot of newbs out there or a lot of ignorant webmasters. The law has changed over the last few months.

                                                                                          Originally posted by jimthefiend
                                                                                          And this from a producer.



                                                                                          Jesus Christ.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • Ravage
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Mar 2007
                                                                                            • 2242

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            Originally posted by jimthefiend
                                                                                            Exactly. Whoever leaked that needs to be shot.
                                                                                            Then the one you need to shoot is most likely the one posing in the picture. You honestly think someone else leaked it other than people in her camp? I mean, why did they immediately confirm its her? They could have very easily said its a great fake and the media would most likely have bought that.

                                                                                            This is perfect publicity for her and she gets out of her exclusive Disney contract and can work on other things. Its a risky move, no doubt, but she's young, cute and talented, so it can work in her favor.

                                                                                            The question of her age is an interesting one; and I doubt anyone will date the photo to protect the photographer and her. Being that its confirmed its her, and she's well known in mainstream, I doubt the FBI is going to go after 2257 on it.
                                                                                            Formerly known as Adult Rental Chris
                                                                                            ICQ - 452-693-463 | Skype: xravagex

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • TubeTitans_SusieQ
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • May 2007
                                                                                              • 3884

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by Adult Lounge - Brad
                                                                                              Seen it, sucks to be here. what a dumb ass she is for admitting that it was her in the picture.
                                                                                              I totally agree, its not like there aren't many other girls that don't look similar to her....





                                                                                              ICQ: 370399852

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • KimJI
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • May 2007
                                                                                                • 1839

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by Platinum ChrisM
                                                                                                I mean, why did they immediately confirm its her? .
                                                                                                The truth is they didnt make any comment on it (when asked) for the first 24 hours, because they needed/wanted to verify the authenticity.
                                                                                                Trafficadept | Best traffic I have ever tested | web "@t" cuul.org

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • Brother Bilo
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Jun 2007
                                                                                                  • 4193

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Jesus, everyone flipping out of the 2257 here. Simma down now!!! She's 18 and probably has been for a while. That looks like it was taken with a cell camera, most likely by the dude that's plowing her, which means she's probably living on her own, or staying with him. Either way, what kind of parent lets a 17 year old live alone or with a guy?

                                                                                                  Just take it for what it is, a good looking girl that ass out.

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Ravage
                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                    • Mar 2007
                                                                                                    • 2242

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    Originally posted by KimJI
                                                                                                    The truth is they didnt make any comment on it (when asked) for the first 24 hours, because they needed/wanted to verify the authenticity.
                                                                                                    Ahh, the report I heard was they said they confirmed it was her when contacted. Love how the same story never correlates amongst all the news reports
                                                                                                    Formerly known as Adult Rental Chris
                                                                                                    ICQ - 452-693-463 | Skype: xravagex

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...