Originally Posted by NaughtyVisions

Am I the only one who can see their side of this? You're promoting their Bryci site. From what I saw when I looked at the tour, she does not do hardcore on their Bryci site. I'm assuming that Bryci was once TiaTeen, judging by the watermarks on the pics you posted. The TiaTeen site is no longer live, so it's safe to assume that she is no longer using that alias. As Bryci, she is a softcore model, regardless of her past under a different name. Since you are promoting their softcore Bryci site (not a hardcore TiaTeen site), referring to the persona of Bryci as a porn star or hardcore model could be misleading to potential members of the site.

A lot of you guys on here comment that it's no wonder paysites get chargebacks when their tours promise so much and then in side the members area it fails to deliver. I think this is a similar case. Granted, their tour does not indicate hardcore, but if a customer gets interested in her site through your promotion of her as a porn star or hardcore model, then they probably won't even check out her site tour, and will just sign up. Imagine their disappointment when there's no cock swallowing or pussy pounding to be found. I'd be pissed, and at minimum would request a refund.

Here's a prime example: Peter North started out in gay porn under the alias Matt Ramsey. He has since left that alias and side of the industry behind. Would you call or market Peter North as a gay performer? Only if you are pushing Matt Ramsey content. So why would you market Brycie content as if she were still TiaTeen?