|
Why can't Wikipedia be used as a source of information?
Yes it is mostly created by anyone and everyone. But isn't it a collection of information put together to be as accurate as possible by those who know most about the subject? If it can't be trusted on a certain topic then what can? A book written by just one persons point of view? If a professor edited an artical to be more accurate is there no way for his information to overrule something written by Joe Shmoe or at least be edited to be correct by others?
|