-
-
The thread title is misleading and speculative at best.Comment
-
i refuse to do business to anyone who gets traffic from google now.Comment
-
-
That could be bad news for Microsoft, which locked down bing.xxx as a non-resolver. Facebook, likewise, signalled its intention to stay clean by taking facebook.xxx permanently out of circulation.Comment
-
This could get interesting.Whitehat is for chumps
If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!Comment
-
They'll probably just redirect it to the .com. I'm kind of surprised MS wouldn't be doing the same with Bing vs. blocking reg.Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.Comment
-
seems like something is cooking. from august.
http://domainnamewire.com/2011/08/19...x-domain-name/
The company was awarded GoogleXXX.com in a World Intellectual Property Forum ruling just handed down.Comment
-
You got lucky no good images for "flogging a dead horse"
Last edited by Operator; 12-12-2011, 10:23 AM.Comment
-
-
-
ATTN Webmasters Cruel Bucks - LIVE Gonzo Does Not Pay
------------------------------------------------
Animal Rescue Click Here to Feed An Animal for FreeComment
-
.googleporn , new TLD, only way to get their SE traffic, price just 1000$ a yearComment
-
404: PAGE NOT FOUND
If we got something wrong please email [email protected] noting exactly where you found the problem. A screenshot often helps too.
You could try:
Comment
-
that was fast. looks like google is trying to hide something.Comment
-
-
odd does look like they removed the story from their website.
others who linked to the story as well https://twitter.com/#!/search/xxx%20google
google must have been pissed the story was leaked.Comment
-
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/12...e_xxx_youtube/
The link you posted is a 404 page.
That's an assertion too I might add, you are the one making allegations, dummy,Comment
-
Didn't you offer me 100 facebook likes for one of my domains?
What's that about twitter collaborating your non story?
You can't even invent shit properly. Total fail.
Comment
-
proof of allegations or ban
Comment
-
-
yes people are tweeting about an imaginary story i posted on gfy.
offer now lowered to 50 facebook likes for your domain.Comment
-
-
He just put in the wrong link, the story is true and the correct one is here:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/12...e_xxx_youtube/
This should clear it all up.Comment
-
-
-
-
If you don't already know, then you may never know.Last edited by Operator; 12-12-2011, 11:24 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Last edited by Jakez; 12-12-2011, 11:39 AM.Comment
-
Can anyone summarize the rest of the now missing article?prbot at icmregistry dot comComment
-
-
Comment
-
They may have removed it if some facts were in dispute.
From theregister.
Google has ruled out ever launching a website at youtube.xxx, but the same cannot be said for google.xxx, according to domain name Whois records.
The new .xxx web address suffix went live last week, and with it a flurry of data about registrations made during its trademark-protection "sunrise" phase became accessible.
Records now show that the address youtube.xxx was set aside as a non-resolving "Sunrise B" trademark block, under ICM Registry's three-pronged defensive registration scheme.
All Sunrise B domains are permanently locked down and the Whois records display ICM's name instead of the name of the company that paid for the block.
Because the blocks were sold without annual recurring fees, ICM had made it clear that Sunrise B was not a way for domain speculators to cheaply acquire investments.
Under ICM's rules, in other words, there will be no way for Google to ever convert youtube.xxx into a resolving domain name, so we'll never see a website at that address.
But while youtube.xxx is gone for good, that's not true of google.xxx. Google has registered that address as a standard-issue resolving domain name. While visiting the URL google.xxx currently returns an error message, the underlying Whois data shows Google as the official registrant.
This means Google will be free to use it for a live website in future, if it decides to launch an adults-only version of its search engine.
That could be bad news for Microsoft, which locked down bing.xxx as a non-resolver. Facebook, likewise, signalled its intention to stay clean by taking facebook.xxx permanently out of circulation. ICM itself plans to launch a porn search engine at search.xxx in the near future.
The Whois record for twitter.xxx currently suggests that the domain has been held by ICM as a "premium" name that will be auctioned in future. ICM told us, however, that the data is wrong, and that it has no plans to sell off Twitter's name. ®
You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.
Comment
-
Looks like it's just a safety measure.. and they don't want everyone to make a big deal of it. Can't blame them when things like benandjerrys.xxx (made-up example) are being bought just in case.Last edited by Jakez; 12-12-2011, 01:44 PM.Comment
-
-
Comment