View Single Post
Old 12-07-2011, 11:06 PM  
Yanks_Todd
Confirmed User
 
Yanks_Todd's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Valencia
Posts: 2,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Mitchell View Post
Hello,

Before this thread gets rediculous in a way that only GFY could do, let me say there really is NO drama here. I've been very candid and honest about .XXX both online and in person at conferences. I even moderated the (heated) debate in Amsterdam at AVN's Webmaster Access in September impartially.. even though (personally) I haven't been historically impartial on the issue.

MojoHost faithfully (and responsibly) serves more than 700 "adult" entities around the world. This client base represents just less than a hundred thousand adult domains. We have a fiduciary responsibiliy as a ISP/host to route internet traffic to all countries and TLD/sTLDs. .XXX exists. It was only a matter of time before its extension resolved somewhere in our network of clients, clients of clients, or IP space. Surely, the same holds true for all other hosts and networks.

The site in question resolves to an established client that isn't ICM Registry. What does this mean? It means we didn't solicit hosting this site. We were in fact the last to know it resolved here. Will it continue to resolve here? Yes, as long as someone points DNS to one of our IPs.

For the curious out there, I do not have ownership of any .XXX domains.


[/END] Drama


Sincerely,

Brad
Personally I don't have a problem with this. I am against .xxx and I think it is the people in the "trenches" (programs, affiliates) that hold the cards to .xxx's success. I wouldn't expect a good host to play politics that way. Nice response
__________________
Todd Spaits - Co-founder -YanksCash
Premium ad-packages available - Skype for details - tmspaits
Yanks_Todd is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote