I read that in the past it was possible to find underage content on Met-art, i'm curious to know the official version (or your version).
-
-
the word art is used too often to describe things that are far from being considered art. porn is entertainment, no one considers Oprah art. or what tom cruise does, art.
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com -
recent work - About me -
I think a lot of metarts photography is very artisticNetwork Of Adult Blogs With Hardlink Rentals AvailableComment
-
it is not a problem of art...
It is not a problem of meth...Comment
-
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About meComment
-
years and years ago, 10 years at least, there were definitely girls on Met-Art's tour that appeared to be underage, Russian photographers/sites have always been known to play games with age documentation, Gallitsin who I think did shoot for Met way back then had his own paysite Gallitsin Archives and was charge and convicted and i believe is still in jail.
Met swept their site clean 10 years ago and no site I know of is more strict about age documentation, they won't even accept sample photos from Met photographers submitting new models for approval without photo ID's to go with the samples.
Met's not even owned by the original owners anymore.I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!Comment
-
Galitsin's Angels: From Russia with Love ?Comment
-
Met-Art is on the up-and-up. The models are of legal age.Comment
-
Well, yes i think so, they have a californian custodian of record.
read this page:
http://mirror.wikileaks.info/wiki/An...to_child_porn/
feel free to add your comments on this link.Last edited by pornmasta; 12-05-2011, 04:37 AM.Comment
-
-
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/An_insight_into_child_porn
Edit: sorry, just noticed this link was already posted above. However it answers to the OP's question in full. IMHO.Last edited by just a punk; 12-05-2011, 07:07 AM.Obey the CowgodComment
-
Traci Lords.Comment
-
Pretty sure they used to do pics of kids, like ALS, in the 90s, which either they spammed to Usenet groups, or other people did.Comment
-
There was a very famous european photographer who's name escapes me that had beautiful artistic photos with underage girls.
edit; the guy made coffee table photo books.
edit 2; David Hamilton
.Last edited by L-Pink; 12-05-2011, 07:34 AM.Comment
-
Some old timers on GFY even were into this "art" shit.
WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME
ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT
Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr
Comment
-
I can assure you. MetArt is fully and completely legal. As mentioned above there is very rigorous systems in place to be sure.Comment
-
That fucks me off too. "Art". Fuck off.
If you (not you, Roald) are into pics of nudie kids, at least have the balls to it's because it gives you a boner; not because you want to hang it on a wall.
As for "[yeah we did it] but we're very against it now". Oh, that's okay then, right? And nothing at all to do with laws and regulations. Some people would try and make a cent from anything if they could get away with it.Comment
-
meth art
SMC Revenue - Best Tgirl websites of the world now VR
Non exclusive BIG Tranny/shemale Package for sale, full 2257 - hit me up skype: nikkimontero
Comment
-
Because I used to read Usenet in the 90s (and 2000s for that matter).
Usenet was the home of free porn before anyone had even dreamed of selling it online. It's where millionaire webmasters of 2011 used to steal porn from and sell it in the 90s, before they got rich enough to make their own and issue DMCAs, after suddenly deciding for some unknown reason that theft of porn was wrong.Comment
-
-
I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!Comment
-
Grigori Galitsin posted some pretty interesting docs on his Picasa web album last March and his blog shows life is good
Skype: CallTomNow
Comment
-
I think that russian is probably as useful as english in this business ;)Comment
-
-
[QUOTE=helterskelter808;18608413]Which explains why you don't have a clue how Usenet works or what is.
/QUOTE]
That's right, I avoid visiting sites or forums on the internet which are notorious for having child porn posted on them.
The point is - we're talking about (I assume, in relation to met-art) naked pictures of 16 and 17 year old 'kiddies' when it was legal back then in most places in Europe.You seem to be taking a while to get your point.
O.K., I can see how somebody whose very religious, or otherwise puritanical could get on their high horse about it and think that anyone who involved themselves with that even when it was legal are going to burn in hell.
I really can't see how people like the majority of us here, who make money out of hardcore porn featuring girls primarily 18 - 21, could see it as much of an issue at all, to be honest.
And, yea, it is a bit weird that you need to make a point of declaring such firm views and lecturing others when you admit to frequenting groups in which such child porn was regularly posted. In most countries viewing child porn is illegal, and going back to forums or groups in which it is regularly posted or 'spammed' wouldn't even begin to count as any excuse in a court of law.Comment
-
Why are you making such a show of denying something that nobody has even accused you of?
Earlier you were speaking on behalf of everyone here, now it's most people here. Can you give a list of, say, 25 people who agree with you that images of naked underage girls are not much of an issue at all?I really can't see how people like the majority of us here, who make money out of hardcore porn featuring girls primarily 18 - 21, could see it as much of an issue at all, to be honest.
Please quote which "firm views" of mine you think are weird, exactly.And, yea, it is a bit weird that you need to make a point of declaring such firm views
Who have I lectured, exactly?and lecturing others
I really don't want to see anyone banned, but since you're simply flat out lying now, and making serious false accusations, I'll give you a chance to either back up that lie with a quote from me saying anything even remotely like 'I frequent groups where CP was regularly posted', or you can retract it and admit you're a liar who is remarkably upset at things I said that nobody else seems to have a problem with.when you admit to frequenting groups in which such child porn was regularly posted.
If you read the thread, fuckwit, you'll see not only did I not say anywhere that I read forums or groups where CP is posted (regularly or not), the first person (between the two of us) to specifically refer to CP was you, and the only reason I mentioned it was in reply to you.In most countries viewing child porn is illegal, and going back to forums or groups in which it is regularly posted or 'spammed' wouldn't even begin to count as any excuse in a court of law.
Once you've read the thread again and realized what thin ice you're on, I'd advise you to make your apology.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
What am I protesting, exactly?
What am I projecting, exactly?Comment
-
You should have read that link on projection, rather than just posting it. Though it did shed interesting light on why you seem to post so often about accused child sex offender Jerry Sandusky. Is he also Jewish? And why you decided to get involved in this thread.
How many other threads have you started on the subject of child abuse, porno jew? How many posts have you obsessively made referring to "penn state" in threads that weren't about it? How many threads about child abuse or CP have you clicked on and replied to?
Do you neighbors know about what you get up to online, porno jew, and that you start threads about child abuse on a pornography forum? Please explain.Comment
-
-
-
Comment