[QUOTE=helterskelter808;18608413]Which explains why you don't have a clue how Usenet works or what is.
/QUOTE]
That's right, I avoid visiting sites or forums on the internet which are notorious for having child porn posted on them.
Quote:
|
You seem to be taking a while to get your point.
|
The point is - we're talking about (I assume, in relation to met-art) naked pictures of 16 and 17 year old 'kiddies' when it was legal back then in most places in Europe.
O.K., I can see how somebody whose very religious, or otherwise puritanical could get on their high horse about it and think that anyone who involved themselves with that even when it was legal are going to burn in hell.
I really can't see how people like the majority of us here, who make money out of hardcore porn featuring girls primarily 18 - 21, could see it as much of an issue at all, to be honest.
And, yea, it is a bit weird that you need to make a point of declaring such firm views and lecturing others when you admit to frequenting groups in which such child porn was regularly posted. In most countries viewing child porn is illegal, and going back to forums or groups in which it is regularly posted or 'spammed' wouldn't even begin to count as any excuse in a court of law.