if you were a nat geographic photographer, would you leave animals in trouble to die? - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

count of monte cristo

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2004

Posts: 473
Share

Post
#1

if you were a nat geographic photographer, would you leave animals in trouble to die?

08-28-2007, 10:03 PM

i was watching the discovery channel a few days ago and noticed a few cases where the people taking the documentaries seem to leave the animals stricken to die.

in one case there were 2 caribou who had fought and their horns had gotten tangled. one died and as the other was trying to free themselves in vain, the voice in the background said that unfortunately, it had died because they had to play the role of passive observers and couldn’t interfere by freeing the animal.

in another case there was a tortoise that had somehow got stuck on its back, then there was another shot, presumably of the same tortoise later, of a just a skelton laying on its shell

kind of mixed on this, i would have a hard time leaving an animal to die like that

premier payment sending company
Tags: None
Red Ezra

redezra.com

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 4678
Share

Post
#2

08-28-2007, 10:08 PM

best to leave these matters to nature - I would not interfere - if I did I wouldn't tell anybody about it - especially if I was a high profile nature photographer - seems taboo in that perspective.
Comment
riddler

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 3726
Share

Post
#3

08-28-2007, 10:09 PM

pretty sure most of the national geographic people are taught to leave the animals alone..
Comment
StuartD

Sofa King Band

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 29903
Share

Post
#4

08-28-2007, 10:10 PM

It's best not to meddle with nature. Let it happen the way it's meant to happen.

This is me on facebook
This is me on twitter
Comment
Ayla_SquareTurtle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 3550
Share

Post
#5

08-28-2007, 10:12 PM

I would have flipped the tortoise over, but I would not want to get kicked by something as big as caribou. In most of those cases, there's nothing you really CAN do. If you come across an animal tangled in something, trapped in a hole, or whatever, unless it JUST happened, there's just not a whole lot you can do that is safe and useful in any way to the animal.

gone. long gone.

aylasquareturtle .."a"t".. gmail dawt com
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#6

08-28-2007, 10:17 PM

Originally posted by Ayla_SquareTurtle

I would have flipped the tortoise over,

who would have guessed with a name like turtle?

It is nature, leave it up to nature.
Comment
WinstonTriplexcash

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 2192
Share

Post
#7

08-28-2007, 10:29 PM

I'd help if there wasn't any chance of getting myself seriously hurt.
Comment
chodadog

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2002

Posts: 9736
Share

Post
#8

08-28-2007, 10:41 PM

Originally posted by baddog

who would have guessed with a name like turtle?

It is nature, leave it up to nature.

That's a wee bit like saying if someone trips and falls over into a hole they're unable to climb out of, you shouldn't help them out if you happen to pass by because you should leave it up to nature. We may be more intelligent, but we are still animals.

I'd help any animal I saw that was in trouble as long as doing so didn't put me in a position of danger. Flipping a turtle over is a fucking no brainer as far as I'm concerned.

26 + 6 = 1
Comment
calibra

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 4357
Share

Post
#9

08-28-2007, 10:42 PM

Originally posted by StuartD

It's best not to meddle with nature. Let it happen the way it's meant to happen.

Sad but true.

GetCyberCash.com
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#10

08-28-2007, 10:44 PM

Originally posted by chodadog

Flipping a turtle over is a fucking no brainer as far as I'm concerned.

Judging by the few other posts of yours that I have read, no brainers should be your specialty.
Comment
american pervert

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 6840
Share

Post
#11

08-29-2007, 12:37 AM

i would eat those animals, why let them go to waste

I can resist everything except temptation
Comment
quiet

we'll miss you our friend. RIP

Join Date: Sep 2001

Posts: 25115
Share

Post
#12

08-29-2007, 12:40 AM

turtle flip, obviously

we'll miss you our friend. RIP
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#13

08-29-2007, 12:45 AM

Originally posted by quiet

turtle flip, obviously

So another animal goes hungry because you decided to meddle?
Comment
Ayla_SquareTurtle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 3550
Share

Post
#14

08-29-2007, 12:52 AM

Originally posted by baddog

who would have guessed with a name like turtle?

It is nature, leave it up to nature.

I am part of nature, so I'd flip the damn thing over.

gone. long gone.

aylasquareturtle .."a"t".. gmail dawt com
Comment
zand_stein

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2007

Posts: 1438
Share

Post
#15

08-29-2007, 01:01 AM

as a concern citizen, definitely not, its because as a human being i believed that animals are gods creation therefore we entitled to take care of their lives as like how we take of ourselves because all of us are gods creation, we should promote life.

Paying Affiliates DAILY by ePassporte!
Comment
flashfire

ICQ 1 6 7 8 5 3 4 9 2

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 13098
Share

Post
#16

08-29-2007, 01:05 AM

they should leave the animals...in nature there is a reason for everything
Comment
DS250

Registered User

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 411
Share

Post
#17

08-29-2007, 01:05 AM

Originally posted by baddog

Judging by the few other posts of yours that I have read, no brainers should be your specialty.

Judging by your 50,000+ posts you have no place to talk. So if you are walking your dog by a canal, and an alligator pops out and tries to eat your dog, you shouldn't interfere because you shouldn't spite nature? So the alligator should go hungry because you interfered? You are the most worthless poster on this board. You constantly try to start conflict with no intelligence to back it up. Why don't you bleach those nasty liver spots off your forehead?
Comment
hzoltan

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 2007
Share

Post
#18

08-29-2007, 01:11 AM

Originally posted by chodadog

That's a wee bit like saying if someone trips and falls over into a hole they're unable to climb out of, you shouldn't help them out if you happen to pass by because you should leave it up to nature. We may be more intelligent, but we are still animals.

I'd help any animal I saw that was in trouble as long as doing so didn't put me in a position of danger. Flipping a turtle over is a fucking no brainer as far as I'm concerned.

I was thinking the same thing. What's the differene between a human and an animal? Why would you help a man in trouble and leave an animal to die? If I would ever shoot that kind of documentary about a flipped over turtle I'd say "Oh,yeah, that's the way it has to be. Natural selection." and so on, but after shooting, I'd turn the damn thing back to it's feet.

Gabriel - [email protected] - ICQ 636275551
Comment
DS250

Registered User

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 411
Share

Post
#19

08-29-2007, 01:12 AM

Originally posted by hzoltan

I was thinking the same thing. What's the differene between a human and an animal? Why would you help a man in trouble and leave an animal to die? If I would ever shoot that kind of documentary about a flipped over turtle I'd say "Oh,yeah, that's the way it has to be. Natural selection." and so on, but after shooting, I'd turn the damn thing back to it's feet.

Only stupid hillbilly trash like baddog would use the natural selection argument.
Comment
quiet

we'll miss you our friend. RIP

Join Date: Sep 2001

Posts: 25115
Share

Post
#20

08-29-2007, 01:15 AM

Originally posted by baddog

So another animal goes hungry because you decided to meddle?

not sure how i am meddling. we are all part of nature. i have a science degree in Genetics, and have never heard of something quite so ridiculous. yes, i would turn the turtle over. just like i would help a drowning puppy out of a lake. or a drowning baby out of a bathtub. did i forget the prime directive?

we'll miss you our friend. RIP
Comment
crockett

in a van by the river

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 76818
Share

Post
#21

08-29-2007, 01:49 AM

I'd flip the turtle over for sure, just like I'd pick one up crossing a road and help it. On the caribou, it would really depend if I thought I could actually help it without getting myself hurt.

Those that say, let nature run it's course.. You do know there are many cases of Dolphins protecting humans from sharks don't yea? If you can save an animal you should regardless of what "nature" thinks.

In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Comment
JamesK2

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 6589
Share

Post
#22

08-29-2007, 01:58 AM

I wouldn't film dying animals. I'm a pussy when it comes to that
Comment
Sarah_Jayne

Now with more Jayne

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 40077
Share

Post
#23

08-29-2007, 02:58 AM

If it is natural things happening then sometimes they just have to happen. Now, if it was a poacher coming in after the animals that would be different.
Comment
TommySoprano

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2007

Posts: 111
Share

Post
#24

08-29-2007, 04:23 AM

Those bastard NatGeo photographers left it die in vain...

Sig too big???

ExtraordinaryWay
Exclusive Custom Ads, Banners and other Ads
Adult Design, Tour Pages, Affiliate Design
Cool Custom WordPress Themes w install

Flash Video Players
Afiiliate code ready custom flash video players!!!

Make a wish! ICQ: 190430478
Comment
JMM

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 1755
Share

Post
#25

08-29-2007, 04:59 AM

It is a strict code. People working on documentaries, and news stories, are taught never to get involved in the story. They are there to report and document events, not get involved in them.
Comment
cherrylula

lol

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 15969
Share

Post
#26

08-29-2007, 05:17 AM

I would help the animals, because one day I hope the animals would help me.

Animals are my friends, I don't eat them either.

But I can see how the NG photogs can't help all those animals they shoot. And ultimately they are creating content to make money, not there to help anyone.
Comment
da man

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2005

Posts: 2375
Share

Post
#27

08-29-2007, 05:22 AM

Originally posted by TommySoprano

Those bastard NatGeo photographers left it die in vain...

omfg, what happened here?

btw, I agree with JMM and cherry as well - so hard to decide.

Last edited by da man; 08-29-2007, 05:24 AM.

Mike Cross : Kink.com : ICQ: 413115769
Comment
alby_persignup

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 3119
Share

Post
#28

08-29-2007, 06:06 AM

Originally posted by TommySoprano

Those bastard NatGeo photographers left it die in vain...

This is too much!

OnProbation Links Directory | OnProbation Design Services | OnProbation Cash
Comment
justinsain

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 3374
Share

Post
#29

08-29-2007, 06:32 AM

If I was working as a photographer for National Geographic I would understand that I'm there as an observer and it's my place not to interfere with the course of nature. I would be there to record the action in hope of gaining a greater understanding which in it's own way is a course of nature.

If I was on my own just hiking through the woods and came upon an animal in distress, I would do what I could to give it a second chance.
Comment
Cyndalie

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 3615
Share

Post
#30

08-29-2007, 06:43 AM

As a photographer your job is to observe and record nature, I'm sure nat geo is sure about this policy, however when the camera stops I wouldn't doubt that a journalist untangles a bird from some string, or flips a turtle every now and then.

Cyndalie
Marketing Director
StoriesTraffic.com
Comment
count of monte cristo

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2004

Posts: 473
Share

Post
#31

08-29-2007, 06:47 AM

Originally posted by Ayla_SquareTurtle

I am part of nature, so I'd flip the damn thing over.

hahahahahaha good answer

premier payment sending company
Comment
D

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2006

Posts: 7412
Share

Post
#32

08-29-2007, 07:28 AM

Originally posted by DS250

Only stupid hillbilly trash like baddog would use the natural selection argument.

Or someone who's loyal to the ethics of the job.

If I was there as a National Geo photographer, I'm pretty sure "noninterference" would be an ethic pretty high on the agenda... in all facets of what I'm doing, 24/7.

There's no Gonzo Journalism on the Nature channel.

But if I'm I just strolling along on my own, that'd be a different story... and I'd probably flip the turtle, or try to untangle the caribou, or whatever.

-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
Comment
dav3

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 7348
Share

Post
#33

08-29-2007, 07:46 AM

I don't think they are allowed to touch the animals at all.

I was watching this one show on there, it had a newbie host and they were underwater filming while he was talking. I forget what the show was about. But, in one scene you see him trying to pet on of the animals in the water, then the scene cut out and next you see him with his arms behind his back like he had been told not to touch them. I'm no expert, of course, but judging by his body language, he was trying really hard to make it known he wasn't going to touch the animals.

Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree
Comment
sniperwolf

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 17743
Share

Post
#34

08-29-2007, 07:47 AM

Originally posted by JMM

It is a strict code. People working on documentaries, and news stories, are taught never to get involved in the story. They are there to report and document events, not get involved in them.

That's exactly the point of documentarist. However, what others don't understand is why would these people let the animals die in front of themselves. It's a case to case basis I would say. And in the case of documentarists, they just shoot for the sake of showing what happen to those animals. You cannot really blame them.

~Accepting design works~
Comment
Mutt

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 34431
Share

Post
#35

08-29-2007, 07:49 AM

Originally posted by TommySoprano

Those bastard NatGeo photographers left it die in vain...

omg how did this poor boy get stuck like this. surely he'd have just fallen over on his side.

i'm nauseous.

Nature photographers aren't equipped with equipment to rescue animals - in the matter of turning the tortoise over you have to be a cruel bastard not to help. there are things much more important than the rules of journalism. following that loopy logic a reporter could be standing in a crowd where the President is making a speech, the reporter sees the guy next to him pull out a gun and pointing it at the President - now the reporter is supposed to just be recording all this, instead of tackling the assailant he just watches and describes it into his tape machine or whatever gadget they use these days.

I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#36

08-29-2007, 08:16 AM

Originally posted by D

Or someone who's loyal to the ethics of the job.

If I was there as a National Geo photographer, I'm pretty sure "noninterference" would be an ethic pretty high on the agenda... in all facets of what I'm doing, 24/7.

There's no Gonzo Journalism on the Nature channel.

But if I'm I just strolling along on my own, that'd be a different story... and I'd probably flip the turtle, or try to untangle the caribou, or whatever.

You are right and thats why I could never be that type of photog because I would want to help but thats not nature.Also if you dont have the meds to knock out the caribou trying to untangle caribou might get you killed.
Comment
jonesonyou

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 3853
Share

Post
#37

08-29-2007, 08:19 AM

depends on how cute the animal was.

Completely Real Amateur girls doing awesome things! Signup to promote Nebraskacoeds Today!
Hit me up on ICQ/AIM 473324556/jasonnecoeds for exclusive content to promote with! And any ?'s
Comment
p1mpdogg

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 16714
Share

Post
#38

08-29-2007, 08:20 AM

id have got my desert eagle and pinned it between the eyes.

the turtle and the caribou both.

A fast fortune is easy to earn! Just go with a winner!
Comment
Angie77

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2007

Posts: 1356
Share

Post
#39

08-29-2007, 08:25 AM

Only if they were cute and fluffy animals... I'm kidding, I'd leave things to nature.

Best Conversions, Highest Payouts in the industry, Dedicated affiliate support: What more could you ask for? Sign up Today!
Comment
dav3

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 7348
Share

Post
#40

08-29-2007, 08:28 AM

Originally posted by TommySoprano

Those bastard NatGeo photographers left it die in vain...

Nice rack!

Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree
Comment
D

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2006

Posts: 7412
Share

Post
#41

08-29-2007, 08:30 AM

The thing a lot of you guys don't seem to understand is that nature doesn't waste anything.

Nature is extremely proficient at making use of any decomposing organic matter. The nutrients in those caribou might have been a first meal for a starving mother grizzly - just out of hibernation - looking for nutrients to supplement her milk production for her 2 cubs, or fast-forward 400 years, and they might have gone to spur the growth of a seedling that's now a tall tree, supporting an entire ecosystem itself, offering shelter to hundreds if not thousands of macroscopic life forms, or whatever...

I'm sure any journalist working for Nat'l Geo is at least versed in the basics on ecological biology, and that helps him commit to the whole "noninterference" thing.

Besides, the animals' behavior - whether they live or die - might provide people back home with a better understanding of some detail of nature... and who is the journalist to interfere with that? Would you have the cameraman filming hundreds of lemmings jumping off a cliff to their death run out there and wave them all back screaming "Don't do it! It's nto worth it!!"?

-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
Comment
D

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2006

Posts: 7412
Share

Post
#42

08-29-2007, 08:34 AM

Originally posted by tony404

You are right and thats why I could never be that type of photog because I would want to help but thats not nature.Also if you dont have the meds to knock out the caribou trying to untangle caribou might get you killed.

Yeah, I hear you, man... not sure it's for me either, but maybe for different reasons.

After hearing what some of those guys had to live through just to get the right shot for "Planet Earth".... 2 weeks at the top of some frozen mountain... living in a giant mountain of bat dung... driving all over the uninhabited parts of China for a month with no resupply... I'm not sure if I could cut that.

-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
Comment
riabanana

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2007

Posts: 313
Share

Post
#43

08-29-2007, 08:35 AM

I'll follow my conscience.

Vibrators, dildos, cock rings and all other sex toys? We've got them ALL for you.

http://venustoys.com
Comment
Clark Miller

Registered User

Join Date: Jun 2007

Posts: 365
Share

Post
#44

08-29-2007, 08:38 AM

I would watch...the way Cannon sees it

www.nebraskacoeds.com
Hit me up to promote Nebraskacoeds.com! (or just click above)
Comment
Drake

Hello world!

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12508
Share

Post
#45

08-29-2007, 09:40 AM

Case by case. If I'm filming a documentary to show viewres what nature is like when man isn't around, I'd record it without interfering. If I'm on my own and I see some animal in distress, and I can help it (without risking my own life - such as helping a bear or other large animal that may just eat me after I save it), I likely will.
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#46

08-29-2007, 09:51 AM

Originally posted by D

Yeah, I hear you, man... not sure it's for me either, but maybe for different reasons.

After hearing what some of those guys had to live through just to get the right shot for "Planet Earth".... 2 weeks at the top of some frozen mountain... living in a giant mountain of bat dung... driving all over the uninhabited parts of China for a month with no resupply... I'm not sure if I could cut that.

I met a guy who shot for National Geo, he now shoots glamour. He told the best stories and lots of scary shit, him and his guide being chased by a bunch of pissed baboons.How when National geographic sent you out for a shot,you better come back with the shot no excuses.
Comment
GAMEFINEST

Make STACK$

Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 14470
Share

Post
#47

08-29-2007, 09:55 AM

i would, unless they are endangered ..

Compound interest.
Comment
jeffrey

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 1864
Share

Post
#48

08-29-2007, 10:01 AM

Originally posted by hzoltan

I was thinking the same thing. What's the differene between a human and an animal? Why would you help a man in trouble and leave an animal to die? If I would ever shoot that kind of documentary about a flipped over turtle I'd say "Oh,yeah, that's the way it has to be. Natural selection." and so on, but after shooting, I'd turn the damn thing back to it's feet.

A man in trouble is one of your own, it would be like an other turtle coming over to flip the turtle over. Although that turtle is probably on its back because it lost a battle with said turtle already, who would you be to give one turtle the upper hand over the other? Sure its cruel, but its the way it is.

What if that stuck caribou was injured and got a disease, and by you helping it get untangled you helped spread that disease to the whole herd....

They only observe because everthing they do ripples down to something.
The only time they will help is if they caused the problem.

Coming Soon!
Comment
SmokeyTheBear

►SouthOfHeaven

Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 28609
Share

Post
#49

08-29-2007, 10:04 AM

by helping them you are really hurting them, because you can't be there everytime.

hatisblack at yahoo.com
Comment
count of monte cristo

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2004

Posts: 473
Share

Post
#50

08-29-2007, 01:51 PM

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear

by helping them you are really hurting them, because you can't be there everytime.

One bright morning a boy rushed to get up and get out to the beach. There had been a terrible storm the night before and he could just imagine all the treasures which had washed ashore during the night. When the boy got to the beach he was amazed to see the beach covered with thousands of starfish. They had been washed way up onto the sand and were starting to dry out. The boy knowing that they would die began to pick them up and throw them back into the water. A man who was strolling on the beach watched the boy frantically rushing to throw the starfish back into the ocean. The man approached the boy and said, "You know you can never throw all of these starfish back into the ocean. There are too many and they are already dying. Your throwing them back won't make any difference." The little boy carrying another starfish in his hands, stopped and looked into the man's eye thoughtfully.. then tossing the starfish into the waves he replied, "It makes a difference to that one!" and he rushed off to try and save more of the dying starfish.

premier payment sending company
Comment

Previous 1 2 template Next

Working...