Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7
Paul Markham's work not only speaks for itself, it SCREAMS how awful it is and how he has no talent, no knowledge, no skills.
|
Yet I have made more money with a camera than you ever will make. so how do you figure that out?
Quote:
Of course there are some sad blokes here who have a complex about how little they know and want to prove how clever they are by criticizing anything anyone else posts.
We are happy to let our work speak for itself.
|
Your work speaks volumes.
Yes Jimmy, the rules are good for people like Cherry. He would know this if he had any training. Rules like,
If you're going to shoot a sequence that requires a close up of a girls rear end, make sure she has a flawless skin.
Pubic stubble is a turn off.
Pale skinned girls against a white background are not to be shot.
Yellow Gels on a white background and pale skinned girl makes her look jaundiced.
Stand a girl away from a white background or "blue wall" so you can back light it.
Don't over expose a pale girl on a white back ground.
But decent underwear if you want to look like you can afford it.
Cut out the labels.
Get decent music to overlay on a scene like a striptease, stripper or fantasy style would be best.
Idiots who break the above rules, need to have a clue how to break or stick to them.
Telling someone who has survived 34 years in porn that his work is awful. Shows stupidity.
Cherry can insult me all he likes, he's clearly untrained, never read a proper book on photography and has no qualifications. Just accuses, others who admit they learned by being on the job. They had no formal training.