Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
I suppose that's one way of looking at it.
On the other hand, the way I see it is, I don't want to have anything to do with a company that has employees that may well interact with my account and mistakenly believe shit like this constitutes any kind of "proof". Your employees are a reflection of your company. To me, Media Guy reflects badly on your company.
To each their own I suppose.  |
Your government has actually provided little or no proof of their version of their story, much along the lines of the Iraq WMDs or that little "nurse" who testified that Hussein's soldiers were yanking babies out of nurseries in the first Gulf war back in the 90s.
I do my research and come to what I now contend from some evidentiary basis, to my way of seeing things.
I believe that my conclusions are sound, and relate them without guile and to the risk of my credibility or personal reputation based on personal ethics and judgement.
In no way would this or that affect my "interaction" with your account or allow anything outside of dollars and cents permit me to treat you with anything less than full respect for your beliefs, business or bullshit. Even in these forums I don't call names or react harshly or without providing benefit of the doubt and room to question.
Ask Rochard, my sparring partner ;)
Let's say I believe in a woman's choice on abortion, and that's not your credence... would you think that reflects badly on us?
Do you think investing in 2much.net would be endorsing any beliefs that aren't yours, pro or con? Could you really conduct business with anyone in the world if it had to be based on their full set of beliefs and philosophy matching yours?
Get a better reason. No, actually, get a
reason.
.