Quote:
Originally Posted by theking
Yep! Yep! the well known "truthers" denied what they witnessed with their own eyes as shown by actual demonstrations. I have also seen the documentary of computer models that explained the why and how...but of course the "truthers" find fault with those also. Yep! Yep!
|
It wasn't denied. The demo was faulty.
Computer recreations by NIST where they denied requests for the data used are not valid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking
In the case of the "thermite" demo...commercial thermite was used and it would not cut the beams...but one or more of the "truthers" said well the military has thermite that would cut the beams. How would they know that since I am not aware of a demonstration that the military has conducted showing that their thermite would cut the beams. The "truthers" simply are not going to accept any truth other than what they think is the truth...for whatever their reason/reasons.
|
The thermite demo you're referring to did not use the thermite properly, first of all, and secondly what was found in the dust was unreacted nano-thermite.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Let's talk science: When a large airplane full of jet fuel hits a building one thousand feet up in the air and sets fire to it for hours, eventually the building falls down.
I saw it with my own eyes.
|
What you think you saw is not the same as what happened. And science concluded that one or two airplanes hitting those buildings would not have brought them down the way they came down.
:D