Compete with Twistys/OT? Watch out Manwin!

2 retired people (1 a bit better then the other but whatever) arguing on GFY, great stuff!

Hey Shap!!!

This should be pasted in every Paul Markham thread.

Yup. Nailed it gramps!

Really? You mean Paul doesn't know all the details of your business?

And he is...lying?

NO WAIS!!!!!!111???!11111

This was really all you needed to say.

Halfway mark.

5 more pages to go.

Now he has managed to troll Shap into replying we should get this one to 20 pages I reckon.

YOU GO PAUL! TROLL OF THE YEAR!

I agree with you totally... Only from one though... I notice the only person looking like a retard, is Damian


I'm reading the thread & to me it looks reads as if a few guys are chatting with the occasional useless post is Damian, the thread poster. He also mentioned Paul said that his (pauls) photos were better than Twistys, he never did, he only said his was up to Twistys standard, which is fair deal

Well done for trying. It's sweet.

Now, quote me saying that. I asked Paul to and he can't. See if you can.

Or else I'll just start making shit up you didn't say.

Hey Shap,
I had the same argument with him recently on another board.
I usually just ignore him but got fed up with his generalisations and decided to put him straight. It took a while but I got there in the end.
"So apology to SubAms. He did have a magazine shooter working for him.
I was wrong."

No I never said my shooting was good enough for Twistys. I was saying this content on my site, or something like that, Damian being a dumb ass who knows little about porn. Assumed it was my shooting. Then threatened to make me look stupid. Whoops.

Obviously the figures I posted were for a one off solo girl shoot. Look what happens when updates are figured in. And the same with a BG site with and without updates.



Clear why some decided to launch small sites with no updates. This screwed affiliates submitting "saturated" exclusive content to TGP sites.

Post proof. Liar. You've been called on this 4 times now I think in this thread. You really need to either stop saying it, or post proof.

Or just call me a loser and post a pic of my old flat if it helps you get through the day.

I point it out!

:D

Your numbers are all skewed Paul. Just totally wrong.

If there were any solo girl sites with 10,000 members they would be millionaires.

Your numbers have all kinds of crazy overhead that just doesn't exist. For instance...9 out of 10 sales we get are type in traffic. Affiliates barely register on sales anymore. So right off the bat your "traffic costs" are wrong.

I would NEVER add 1 scene a day. That's just crazy for a solo girl site. And would quickly burn out our members. Nope...one every couple of weeks has been the key to success for us. Of course we supplement that with a free live cam show every week and member interaction via members area email and a members area "wall" so they are always in touch with CM

Basically what I'm saying is...our overhead is almost non-existant. For every $29.99 sale that is a type in I'm making $27 of it. CM doesn't get paid per scene. And I don't pay the male talent at all. My hosting bill is $1400 every month for ALL my boxes (not just CM)

I bought my gear (lights and cameras) years ago so that is all paid for already (though I do of course upgrade occassionally...but compared to what we make it's nothing)

Just saying...for a solo girl site, there is no need to hire a photographer/videographer or have much of any expenses.

2,000 members and I will profit $500,000 a year. And that's just on paysite sales. Doesn't count all the money that the "fame" brings in on her doing cams. And it doesn't count the money it brings in for her doing appearances at clubs, bachelor parties, etc.

All in all it's easily a cool million a year profit for a "mom and pop" operation like ours with a strong work ethic, the knowledge and skill neccessary, and the talent.

I'm not sure where you think those numbers you posted come from. But for a solo girl site you are putting up WAY too much overhead.

Honestly? I've never crunched the numbers down (my accountant does that). But just looking at Stats Remote and knowing my overhead off the top of my head...I'd say that total overhead is less than 10% (maybe even lower) for us.

The most frightening words in the English Language.