Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmycooper
Websites like that do exist. Some do well and some don't.
|
Twistys had what most others didn't the "Bro" status of Shap and a lot of traffic that followed.
As a professional content producer for 3 decades it was easy to spot where the content was letting down the site. Too many of the images were repeated, too many in portrait framing when screens now are wide screen format and lots of the poses were simply wrong.
With the videos, a lot of them were of the girls standing up, which in widescreen HD makes for a great shot of the room and a small girl. The success or failure of the video relied on the model's performance. Few shooters were dictating to the model how she worked. So I got the impression the girls did "their thing" which with LA porn stars usually means auto pilot.
One shooter seemed too interested in getting the room lights to glow in his images, which means shooting at such a wide aperture when the picture is full size it's out of focus. And the "depth of focus" is very low.
The site updated with 3 sets and 2 videos every day. By updating less and better, it would mean a better members area. Size isn't everything, even in porn.
jimmycooper debating with GG on content subjects is like debating with me on flying a jet engine. Except content is more over his head than a jet is over mine.