Lets FUCKING HURT SOMEONE - DRAMA!

anything I've mentioned and all the options to accomplish them is 100 legal
in every way. If I would be willing to go the illegal way all his sites would
be down in less than an hour.....and they'll stay down long enough if not
till I decide to stop...but those stunts I decided to retire when I was 20 years
old.......good memories though

Mutt I hear what you're saying.....and I respect you for your position and
opinion about not pretending it's not there.........that and the fact that
from all people that show off their girls.....you're the undisputed king of
finding the most amazing, pretty, sexy and imho opinion the natural non
posed and directed pics from any other talent scout. If I see pic in a
thread started by you.....I'm inside in less than a split second.
but that aside from the subject.

I think that BEFORE exploring any legal options collecting as much info
as possible is crucial for pursuing any legal steps.....coz without it
you'll get billed by your lawyer who will do this and most likely we're
much better at it than him given our experience and our full time
attention to our business and everything that goes on in it. A super
lawyer his skills are law....not collecting information from whatever
he's not full time involved in himself. He could tell us what kind of
information is useful for this case.

Doing this job ourselves is a lot cheaper in fact all it takes is a little bit of
our time. And providing him with that information will increase the change
of success 100 fold when actually going to trial.

Apart from that.....I think that's not impossible to even shut them down
or at least really hurting his "business" by jumping on them and
tracing everything they do faster and more effectively than defending
his sites in court.

Having to move providers a few times in 1 or 2 months is much more
frustrating and damaging then to show up in court.

It's very easy and not much work to really drive him nuts with things like
this and doesn't require a judge or legal valid argument to get providers
can his ass to even only avoid the hassle it causes them when keeping him.

Having to move his site will inevitably hurt his traffic volume really bad which
will also hurt his advertising and revenue they make coz their only source
of income is generated from nothing else than traffic.

Seriously consulting a lawyer before collecting data and info imho is a complete waste of your money, time......and good intentions. The only
reason for inmediately go to a lawyer would be so he can we ourselves
don't have to bother and do anything for this our selves......and I don't
mean to imply that's why I think you'll wait and go with having a lawyer
figure all of it out himself



P.S. I'm sure with one of your pics this thread will draw a lot more attention

heh... in that case maybe we should all be pooling into a donation box to hire "someone" to knock them off the web for a nice long stretch... would be a thing of beauty to see all those links go dead simultaneously and stay down..

Keep doing what you are doing, it is valuable and definitely going to be needed.

The reason to consult with a lawyer was to determine WHAT information and data should be collected. Interestingly, the lawyers I spoke with maintain very strongly that contrary to what the sites themselves might think, they are not subject to DMCA protection. Based on that legal argument, there are several provisions of the DMCA that ALL must be met for protection and most of these sites miss on many of them. So, it is important to know what aspects of the DMCA must be met to be afforded protection and to collect the data to prove that they are not compliant, and therefore not protected.

Keep doing what you are doing, it is valuable and definitely going to be needed.

The reason to consult with a lawyer was to determine WHAT information and data should be collected. Interestingly, the lawyers I spoke with maintain very strongly that contrary to what the sites themselves might think, they are not subject to DMCA protection. Based on that legal argument, there are several provisions of the DMCA that ALL must be met for protection and most of these sites miss on many of them. So, it is important to know what aspects of the DMCA must be met to be afforded protection and to collect the data to prove that they are not compliant, and therefore not protected.

hmmm where are the big people in adult now ?

Let's go after their advertisers.

Going after the advertisers on torrent sites?

It's like falling at a sports stadium in disrepair and then suing Budweiser because they have a banner in the rafters. As if they were responsable for the place still being open.

Not gonna happen.

JMM is ok if I icq you?

oh there are people who know exactly who owns Megarotic and where they live. That would be Legendary Lars and Andrew Cornhole from Adult Friend Finder, the single biggest beneficiary of the enormous amount of traffic Megarotic is pulling. AFF makes these sites profitable.

Of course Legendary Lars will tell you that AFF is in a most horrible position - if AFF doesn't make hundreds of thousands of dollars off Megarotic one of AFF's evil competitors will and nobody would want that now would we!!!

AFF and Fling? You might want to pick up more than one lawyer.

how about we first go after the billing company that allows megarotic to bill
for their memberships? I'm sure that's not VISA compliant what they do.

The way to go after the billing company is for everyone who has content on megarotic to send DMCA notices to the biller. One of the main components of DMCA protection is how repeat infringements are handled. For a company to even have DMCA protection, they MUST have a policy dealing with repeat infringement. This would be the easiest way to shut these sites down, the ones who have a pay component.

Sadly, most people don't send DMCA notices because they don't know how.

One of the things that the lawyer is working on is an automated DMCA system for people to use. The "sticky" part that they are investigating is how an automated DMCA system would be viewed as "practicing law".

If it is run by an individual or company then it could be viewed as practicing law without a license. The simple solution is to get a law firm to run it. However, that would take out the most convenient aspect, automated. If a law firm is going to offer it, then there has to be some system of manual review, which of course increases costs.

I'll update you once we have this part figured out.

if not I'll upload some of my stuff so I can join in with the DMCA party

In all seriousness though, given their site's business model, that is 100% fair game. If they want to fuck us by playing dirty, we can fuck them right back by doing the same.