Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Shap was posting a good thread recently about ways to solve the decline of paysite sales. Let's not argue they're not declining because we all know otherwise.
He made some suggestions about improving the members area by increasing what we offered to members. Something I've been posting for years, because I've always believed if you want more sales you need to sell more, not just show the product to more people. Both need to be done.
And yet paysites haven't done enough of this. Just added bigger and more videos.
Mutt then came up with a very good reason why paysites have stuck to just being places to see recorded porn. Any way of increasing the lure and attractiveness of the members area and joining/staying simply wasn't affordable.
Some could afford to add a scene a day, or the big ones 3 a day. How many could afford to do more and how effective would it of been?
Think about it for a second and don't come back with the "Sites were making 1,000-10,000 joins a day." reply. That at the minimum level of 2 months is a 60,000 membership base. $60,000 x $5 = $300,000 profit. $10,000 a day.
Mutt was saying they couldn't afford $500 a day for a porn start to appear live.
Think about it positively and wonder why are 99.95 of paysites still trying to sell what others give away for free?
|
Of course they can pay $500.00 per day if having a live pornstar on line increases sales enough to pay a live pornstar by that amount plus.
Using your figure of $5.00 per sale it would have to increase sales by 100 per day plus...and what evidence do you have to indicate that using a live pornstar would accomplish this? I do not see why it would.