Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Exactly... that's why he twisted his words to say "offline" when we're all talking about online.
He learned the "split testing" word and what it means from Damian, but he still doesn't understand what it really means or all the various ways you can use it.
|
So just keep guessing what tour works. I see your logic. Do you like sending traffic to sites that are testing joins with your traffic?
So lets take Damian's "Split Testing" tours idea and apply it to Qbert's thinking.
The site owner doesn't know what images and video clips will work, so he picks a few at random, gives them to the first designer who replies on GFY to his thread for designers and tells him to put up a site tour.
It doesn't work, he's
"relying on trial and error". No worries It only cost him a $,1000 bucks. Plus the traffic he didn't convert and yours as well. So you lost money.
No worries, he tries again. Same des ..............
you know where I'm going and now see the flaw in your thinking. If each trial is costing money and not working, it's also losing money. You could learn what you're doing and make judgments on your knowledge, experience and skill.
Trying a tour in a pastel pink or a pastel lilac, is OK. But you need to know what you're doing at the beginning.
Maybe I got it wrong about you guys. You're clueless and the only way you can see if something works is
"trial and error".
No hang on, I only have to read your posts to know you're clueless.
