Thats me screwed
Women prefer a 'feminine' appearance in partners...
Collapse
X
-
-
news flash honey: taking money from the husbands pucket while he sleeps is not called "PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES".
or saying to her man: "please buy me a car" - thatt's not "PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES".either.Comment
-
what's the matter girl ? can't deal with the truth so you want to punch me ?
violence is the key for a feminist.
why don't you be proud of what you are.
you are a girl - that is not a bad thing as long as you know your place.Comment
-
Yeah to a point that's true but personally I don't fall flat on my face for women that are very feminine. And I don't walk around town thinking about fucking a feminine woman. LOL
Anyways, if you look for women who are true to themself and are self-aware, then you will never have a problem with them falling for the macho-man.
Comment
-
isn't this the "passionate affair type guy" and the "marring type guy" recycled ?
you know, when the nerd is the one that you marry and the muscle dude is the one you cheat with ?Comment
-
Yes, I believed that it always depends on the place, its culture specifically. I live here in an Asian country and the norm nowadays is that metrosexual men are very attractive to women. Those men who dresses well, smells good, smooth and fine faces. That's the trend now.
~Accepting design works~ 
Comment
-
Comment
-
To say its natural for men to have many partners and not women is just silly. Women can fuck over and over and over again and not have to wait to get hard again. Its been proven that sperm will basically fight sperm from another man inside a woman to get to the egg which shows women were not meant to be monogamous either.The "norm" for human cultures is for the male to have as many wives as he can support. Its a natural fact! Look at any living organism. The males mate with as many females as possible to reproduce. It is only the strong influence of christianity that prohibits this. Left to nature a man should have as many "wives" as he is able to "support for" and "fight for".
Whats far more complexing is that even in the bible many of the heros had multiple wives. Yet today?you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..Comment
-
Comment
-
Not a shock definitely.
Plus I think it's fair, because for centuries women have been looking after themselves, trying to be more attractive, trying to be up to date in fashion and looks... Why shouldn't men do the same thing?
For example in the 20th-21st centuries men started to look after their bodies, working our in the gyms, tracking their meals. A lot of men are doing these things now. Why not add the other things to our armory? Why not taking care of skin, haircut, nails? Not too much of course, but they can be neat and good looking.
And one more example - in medieval times men took bath once a month. Shall we do the same thing nowadays? I doubt...
So it's just evolution, progress... however you call it
Fag................Comment
-
Hey, my Mom raised me and my brother by herself including putting herself through college. She's had sporatic boyfriends here and there, but she didn't need a guy. I think what ends up happening with women who are that self sufficient is that they start to resent when a man tries to do something for them. Just an inside opinion.
Comment
-
Let's just say I know women who paid for their Mercedes in CASH and also have supported their boyfriends while the the guy was going through rough times (paid the bills 100 percent and also helping the guy out with his credit card bills etc) while making six figures a year. And also actually loaned money to the bf to help HIM buy a car.
You do not consider this PROVIDING FOR THEMSELVES AND MORE?Comment
-
Providing for themselves and making a decent living to me making six figures a year (to me that's good because it's comfortable and allows you to have savings in case something happens), I know plenty of women that do make six figures. I guess most people could live on 60-70k a year or whatever, but I say when a woman makes over six figures she's doing pretty good for herself. It's a lot higher than the national average household in the U.S and I know plenty of women that make six figures.
What is your definition of plenty? and what do you call providing for themselves? Sorry to say that a single mother filling out welfare papers for her 3-4 illegit kids is not providing for themselves. Those are MY tax dollars providing for her. And plenty and normal are not equal. Plenty for you might be 1:1000 the NORM would be 600+:1000.
Again let me refresh your mammory in case you forgot.Last edited by bausch; 08-09-2007, 10:22 AM.Comment
-
So plenty to me is over six figures.
What is your definition of plenty? and what do you call providing for themselves? Sorry to say that a single mother filling out welfare papers for her 3-4 illegit kids is not providing for themselves. Those are MY tax dollars providing for her. And plenty and normal are not equal. Plenty for you might be 1:1000 the NORM would be 600+:1000.
I would say if a woman makes over 40k a year or so she could support herself fine (it's just not comfortable, at least not to me), but anyone, male or female making up to and over 6 figures is doing ok. It also depends on where you live. If you live in NY or CA you definitely need over 100k a year.Comment
-
Please, you know you are only talking about yourself.Let's just say I know women who paid for their Mercedes in CASH and also have supported their boyfriends while the the guy was going through rough times (paid the bills 100 percent and also helping the guy out with his credit card bills etc) while making six figures a year. And also actually loaned money to the bf to help HIM buy a car.
You do not consider this PROVIDING FOR THEMSELVES AND MORE?you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..Comment




Comment