100+ CEOs Pledge No Campaign Contributions

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eric
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2000
    • 8818

    #1

    100+ CEOs Pledge No Campaign Contributions

    http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/24/news...ions/index.htm

    Good, I would love to see them pledge the money they would normally dump into these campaigns into US Jobs.

    The sad fact is that these guys are not the problem. The problem is the companies that will still give campaign contributions, and even worse, give money to the special interest groups that circumvent the system and run campaign ads and ads to influence voters. They do so in a way that it is not a campaign contribution, and yet still buys the favors.
    No One
  • Barry-xlovecam
    It's 42
    • Jun 2010
    • 18083

    #2
    PR coup d'état with an end run play — business as usual ...

    Comment

    • Lucy - CSC
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2011
      • 490

      #3
      I find it amusing that you believe there is a difference between Republican and Democrat. They are both 'personally' brought and paid for by the Military Industrial Complex, Banking Institutes and a variety of other nasty bastard organisations. By 'personally' I am talking about the person at the top. Who cares what a low level Senator with good intentions thinks. That low level Senator will remain low level untill he/she sells their soul.
      Dear USA, Your 9/11 is our 24/7, Sincerely Palestine xx

      Comment

      • TheDoc
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Jul 2001
        • 13827

        #4
        Originally posted by Lucy - CSC
        I find it amusing that you believe there is a difference between Republican and Democrat. They are both 'personally' brought and paid for by the Military Industrial Complex, Banking Institutes and a variety of other nasty bastard organisations. By 'personally' I am talking about the person at the top. Who cares what a low level Senator with good intentions thinks. That low level Senator will remain low level untill he/she sells their soul.
        What's more amusing is you self argued a point nobody brought up.
        ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
        It's all disambiguation

        Comment

        • D Ghost
          null
          • May 2006
          • 9819

          #5
          That rocks!

          Comment

          • AmeliaG
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jan 2003
            • 10664

            #6
            That is really brilliant. From a business model perspective, there is not much Starbucks can do, without completely changing their brand, besides hope the economy improves. This goes beyond just hoping.
            GFY Hall of Famer

            AltStar Hall of Famer




            Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

            Babe photography portfolio

            Comment

            • JenniDahling
              Market Penetration Specialist
              • Jul 2005
              • 5285

              #7
              I hope more companies follow suit, and we all should make a concerted effort to support the brands that do.

              cLick my kitty, you know you want to
              jenni {at} prkitty.com
              Meet me at The Island Gathering

              Comment

              • Vendzilla
                Biker Gnome
                • Mar 2004
                • 23200

                #8
                would be cool if it was marketed by listing the companies that aren't contributing against those that are in a major campaign.. But then I love to see people get pissed off
                Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                think about that

                Comment

                • Eric
                  Confirmed User
                  • Dec 2000
                  • 8818

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Lucy - CSC
                  I find it amusing that you believe there is a difference between Republican and Democrat. They are both 'personally' brought and paid for by the Military Industrial Complex, Banking Institutes and a variety of other nasty bastard organisations. By 'personally' I am talking about the person at the top. Who cares what a low level Senator with good intentions thinks. That low level Senator will remain low level untill he/she sells their soul.
                  I don't see anywhere that I stated any political party reference.
                  No One

                  Comment

                  • Lucy - CSC
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2011
                    • 490

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Eric
                    I don't see anywhere that I stated any political party reference.
                    What I was trying to say is it doesnt matter who gets finance and who gets in power. They both answer to the same people and their agendas will both be the same.
                    Dear USA, Your 9/11 is our 24/7, Sincerely Palestine xx

                    Comment

                    • AmeliaG
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 10664

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Lucy - CSC
                      What I was trying to say is it doesnt matter who gets finance and who gets in power. They both answer to the same people and their agendas will both be the same.


                      Which is why bipartisan removal of funding could light a fire under politicians to perform better.
                      GFY Hall of Famer

                      AltStar Hall of Famer




                      Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

                      Babe photography portfolio

                      Comment

                      • Lucy - CSC
                        Confirmed User
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 490

                        #12
                        Originally posted by AmeliaG
                        Which is why bipartisan removal of funding could light a fire under politicians to perform better.
                        They get paid off properly when they leave office.
                        Dear USA, Your 9/11 is our 24/7, Sincerely Palestine xx

                        Comment

                        • AmeliaG
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 10664

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Lucy - CSC
                          They get paid off properly when they leave office.

                          Are you in this industry or posting on GFY for some other reason?

                          Do you really not understand that it is big business which funds much of the political process, so it could really make a difference having CEOs of major corporations making a financial statement about what they want the politicians to do?
                          GFY Hall of Famer

                          AltStar Hall of Famer




                          Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

                          Babe photography portfolio

                          Comment

                          • V_RocKs
                            Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                            • Nov 2003
                            • 32448

                            #14
                            Too bad.. they totally could have gotten some sweet deals.

                            Comment

                            Working...