Originally posted by chodadog I've only done pot a few times.. it's yet to have an effect on me.. My friends say it does take a few times to get a buzz though..
So far, unimpressed! But just need to keep on tokin'
Tell your friends to get a new dealer because it sounds like their smokin hemp! I'll send ya some shit that will make you wonder if it's laced with pcp or something.
Originally posted by chodadog I've only done pot a few times.. it's yet to have an effect on me.. My friends say it does take a few times to get a buzz though..
So far, unimpressed! But just need to keep on tokin'
dude.. they're feeding you oregano!!! .. fuck.. i'll bring you some good stuff when we catch up at the goldcoast meet.. I don't even smoke anymore.. the only reason people say "it takes a few times" is because you're usually young when you first try it and get sold leaf or really shitty heads. trust me.. you could have virgin lungs and if you have some good stuff you'll know it
Form 16 to 21 years old I was smoking every day as much as I could - was my number 1 concern, how to get stoned...
Now at the age of 24 I smoke sometimes (like once a month..) but I am not interested any more...
ideally for healthy THC use you are supposed to smoke once a fortnight.. gives a chance for it to leave your system so you don't have residual THC in your blood all day long every day.. thats what the doctors recommend though.. plus it doesn't get "same old, same old" smoking it..
I used to smoke all the time too but not as much now. I find when I smoke alot now I feel like shit the next day, my enery is drained and I don't feel like doing anything. I also only like to burn when I'm just chillin at home or a friends house because I find when I burn before going out to a club or some place like that I get anti-social; could just be the potentcy of the buds though.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="http://webmasters.legendarylars.com/?Ref=poolbabez"><strong>Legendary Lars</strong></a> - Pimpin' On The Web Since 94'</font>
that article was good for the most part though.. what it comes down to is there was way more leaf back in the 70's.. this type of report crops up every year or two and says pretty much the same shit.. people buy buds now.. thats about it.. you could buy buds back then but the market was more unevolved and more of a grab bag of leaf and shitty heads as well.. they had hash.. they had all the stuff.. it's just a semantic excuse... which they pointed out..
the only silly thing in the report was this
"smoking more pot is dangerous because the drug is bi-phasic: a "reasonable dose will produce euphoria," El Sohly said, but a higher dose will produce unpleasant and potentially harmful effects, such as paranoia and violence."
LOL.. heheh the potent stuff i've had removes the ability to move.. let alone attack in a Mr. Burns like fashion.. violence.. pah.. potheads are about the most un-violent bunch of people i know. some may be mental and sociopaths and wish violence upon people.. but when it actually comes to it they'd rather be watching liquid television..
I grew up in an area where everybody did it. I tried it once and got sick at age 17. I never tried that stuff again. urgh..
I think I stick with my Miller Lite and cigarettes, thats expensive and addicting enough..
All power to you all who smoke it tho! If all the pot smokers would combine their money and lobby to get it legal you all should win
Partying since '96 and not going anywhere Anna's Dorm
Originally posted by bhutocracy ideally for healthy THC use you are supposed to smoke once a fortnight.. gives a chance for it to leave your system so you don't have residual THC in your blood all day long every day.. thats what the doctors recommend though.. plus it doesn't get "same old, same old" smoking it..
Originally posted by bhutocracy i've smoked once in the last 5 years...
that article was good for the most part though.. what it comes down to is there was way more leaf back in the 70's.. this type of report crops up every year or two and says pretty much the same shit.. people buy buds now.. thats about it.. you could buy buds back then but the market was more unevolved and more of a grab bag of leaf and shitty heads as well.. they had hash.. they had all the stuff.. it's just a semantic excuse... which they pointed out..
the only silly thing in the report was this
"smoking more pot is dangerous because the drug is bi-phasic: a "reasonable dose will produce euphoria," El Sohly said, but a higher dose will produce unpleasant and potentially harmful effects, such as paranoia and violence."
LOL.. heheh the potent stuff i've had removes the ability to move.. let alone attack in a Mr. Burns like fashion.. violence.. pah.. potheads are about the most un-violent bunch of people i know. some may be mental and sociopaths and wish violence upon people.. but when it actually comes to it they'd rather be watching liquid television..
Yeh i know where in the hell do all of these "doctors" get violence from stoners are the most nonviolent bunch of people I know
although i quite last month, i still consider myself a smoker god damnit, maybe its the 3 hosed hookah next to the bgiscreen or the dual glass bongs in my bedroom, perhaps its the ounce of leftover chronique sittin in my dual Venetian Hotel peanut jars in my office? shrug hahaha
Originally posted by kmanrox haha i love it, excellent results!
although i quite last month, i still consider myself a smoker god damnit, maybe its the 3 hosed hookah next to the bgiscreen or the dual glass bongs in my bedroom, perhaps its the ounce of leftover chronique sittin in my dual Venetian Hotel peanut jars in my office? shrug hahaha
Thats it. I'm coming over right now and we are smoking that pot, dammit.
Originally posted by bhutocracy i've smoked once in the last 5 years...
that article was good for the most part though.. what it comes down to is there was way more leaf back in the 70's.. this type of report crops up every year or two and says pretty much the same shit.. people buy buds now.. thats about it.. you could buy buds back then but the market was more unevolved and more of a grab bag of leaf and shitty heads as well.. they had hash.. they had all the stuff.. it's just a semantic excuse... which they pointed out..
the only silly thing in the report was this
"smoking more pot is dangerous because the drug is bi-phasic: a "reasonable dose will produce euphoria," El Sohly said, but a higher dose will produce unpleasant and potentially harmful effects, such as paranoia and violence."
LOL.. heheh the potent stuff i've had removes the ability to move.. let alone attack in a Mr. Burns like fashion.. violence.. pah.. potheads are about the most un-violent bunch of people i know. some may be mental and sociopaths and wish violence upon people.. but when it actually comes to it they'd rather be watching liquid television..
Yeah basically all the research I believe is bias. The government makes up these untruthful stories to promote their propaganda. Bottom line is they want to legalize it, but they want to find a way to make money. Problem is, if it is legalized like California, then we would just grow it. Why would we buy it?
Thats all I have to say about that!
I love our government- Canadian that is. We're going to bring a discussion about legalizing pot soon and discuss a motion. The stuff the government has been producing is still shit supposedly, they don't do hydro or anything. They should hire some experts.
Comment