Paysite owners: what you you think about putting a link 2257 into your feeds?

**just a punk** · 07-28-2007, 02:13 PM

bump........

**Jace** · 07-28-2007, 02:42 PM

at the bottom of every blog post? so that when I used the feed it had a 2257 in EACH post?

lol...hell to the no!

btw, since when are people from Russia known for playing by the rules?

**gandalfuy** · 07-28-2007, 02:57 PM

i think it would be a good idea to add a item to the feed with the 2257, but not to every post.

BV · 07-28-2007, 03:01 PM

Hell No! That would be against the rules. The only 2257 info that should be displayed on your domains is your own 2257 page.

If you are linking to your sponsors 2257 page you are fucking up.

**just a punk** · 07-28-2007, 03:42 PM

Originally posted by BV

Hell No! That would be against the rules. The only 2257 info that should be displayed on your domains is your own 2257 page.

If you are linking to your sponsors 2257 page you are fucking up.

Shy not? I believe the paysite owners should take care of their affiliates. I'm thinking to add such an option to my sponsored feed plugin, so it will automatically add a link to 2257 into into every post. Is anybody here interested in that?

**just a punk** · 07-28-2007, 03:45 PM

Originally posted by Jace

at the bottom of every blog post? so that when I used the feed it had a 2257 in EACH post?

Yes, exactly!

Originally posted by Jace

btw, since when are people from Russia known for playing by the rules?

Is it a big surprise for you, Jace? Lots of "people from Russia" have their own affiliate programs, and lots of them are interested in US webmasters, so why don't they should care about them? FYI: we are in a same bot so far.

**Jace** · 07-28-2007, 03:48 PM

Originally posted by cyberxxx

Shy not? I believe the paysite owners should take care of their affiliates. I'm thinking to add such an option to my sponsored feed plugin, so it will automatically add a link to 2257 into into every post. Is anybody here interested in that?

if you did that I would actively ban all programs using that plugin from my blogs

don't give people shit they aren't asking for it

did you see someone asking for this or something?

I am in the USA, I am an active blogger, and I don't care in the least about 2257

**Jace** · 07-28-2007, 03:48 PM

Originally posted by cyberxxx

Yes, exactly!

Is it a big surprise for you, Jace? Lots of "people from Russia" have their own affiliate programs, and lots of them are interested in US webmasters, so why don't they should care about them? FYI: we are in a same bot so far.

**just a punk** · 07-28-2007, 04:05 PM

Originally posted by Jace

if you did that I would actively ban all programs using that plugin from my blogs

It's just your way of doing business. I know you are going to be our competitor when your project will be ready, so it's ok - I don't think those programs will lose anything if you ban them from your splogs - there are 1000's of other bloggers who use their feeds (including me)

Originally posted by Jace

don't give people shit they aren't asking for it

Why not? I know the affiliates are interested to have 2257 info in every feed.

Originally posted by Jace

did you see someone asking for this or something?

Yes I did. And not only once... As far as you can see it was a question for the paysite owners but not for affiliates.

Originally posted by Jace

I am in the USA, I am an active blogger, and I don't care in the least about 2257

You don't but others do. I'm in Russia, so I shouldn't care of 2257 at all, but I do because I'm working with the US webmasters as well and I just can't say "fuck you all" because I respect them

**Lycanthrope** · 07-28-2007, 04:24 PM

You are missing a very important point, a point that has already been made: SITE OWNERS (the affiliates) ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN COMPLIANCE. Linking to a sponsor's 2257 page does absolutely nothing except create a traffic leak.

**just a punk** · 07-28-2007, 04:28 PM

Originally posted by Lycanthrope

You are missing a very important point, a point that has already been made: SITE OWNERS (the affiliates) ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN COMPLIANCE. Linking to a sponsor's 2257 page does absolutely nothing except create a traffic leak.

That's in case if they host the content on their sites. But what's about sponsored RSS feeds that are being hosted outside?

**Lycanthrope** · 07-28-2007, 05:24 PM

Originally posted by cyberxxx

That's in case if they host the content on their sites. But what's about sponsored RSS feeds that are being hosted outside?

Parsing RSS feeds and displaying them on your site constitutes entering into an agreement to display said content. You have therefore (re)produced it and are now responsible for their record keeping.

Same as hotlinking, using javascript / iframes to display ads, etc. etc. etc...

BV · 07-28-2007, 09:29 PM

Originally posted by Lycanthrope

You are missing a very important point, a point that has already been made: SITE OWNERS (the affiliates) ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN COMPLIANCE. Linking to a sponsor's 2257 page does absolutely nothing except create a traffic leak.

Thank You.

BV · 07-28-2007, 09:33 PM

Originally posted by cyberxxx

Shy not? I believe the paysite owners should take care of their affiliates. I'm thinking to add such an option to my sponsored feed plugin, so it will automatically add a link to 2257 into into every post. Is anybody here interested in that?

Why Not?

Because it would be against the regulations!

Your blog, your domain, you display/publish/post sexually explicit content on it, YOU NEED YOUR OWN 2257 PAGE.

Jesus, does anyone even read the regulations?

Contrary to popular belief, they are not that hard to figure out.

Paysite owners: what you you think about putting a link 2257 into your feeds?

Paysite owners: what you you think about putting a link 2257 into your feeds?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment