Quote:
Originally Posted by u-Bob
Of course not. Keeping proof a model is over age is a good thing. Governments making unnecessary rules and regulations about how you must store and make available that information is not. It creates a situation where overzealous government anti-porn crusaders can make your life miserable based on technicalities even if a model was clearly over aged.
|
So can you explain how to write into law "only models who look to be under age" ?
The law is written so that it covers all models, not ones that in someones opinion look old enough.
As for clearly documented, well that's simple. If an FBI officer point to an image of a girl and says "Where's her 2257 documents?" He doesn't want to be told in the hard drive file.
As for you reply about hate and libel, well that wasn't very good. It was a very bad reply. So if someone Tweets that a politician is a pedophile, scammer, criminal or what ever and the news spreads fast, the rumor becomes fact. Then your solution isn't going to work.
What if someone found out you worked in adult and started to post your real name, address and that you were gay and liked young boys. Would your solution work and be acceptable to you?