One seems to be advocating no controls or a lot less on the Internet and the other shows the result of the lack of controls and responsibility.
http://business.avn.com/articles/leg...gn=top_story_1
http://business.avn.com/articles/vid...gn=top_story_2
Should someone be aware that what they say or view online could be traced?
Should someone be allowed to put up a site that's full of hate, hurt and probably libel?
With an unregulated and controlled Internet, piracy is not a crime online, people can get away with it, libel is fine, etc.
This part was very revealing.
Quote:
|
Of course, when it comes to sex the government has never had a problem lumping everyone into a one-size-fits-all, you-might-be-a-criminal box. The 2257 federal labeling and record keeping requirements, which force all producers and disseminators of adult content to keep records that show the age and identity of the performers being displayed, makes a similar assumption.
|
Are they saying keeping proof a model is over age is bad?