-
-
You consider GFY a party? you need to get out more. I suggest when you do get out going straight to an eating disorder clinic.
Unless i have you confused and you fast for religious purposes? if so i do apologize if i offended your religion. It's one of those fasting for God things? ahhh ok I get it now.Last edited by MetaMan; 07-29-2011, 09:00 AM.Comment
-
ron paul flip flops with the best of them. what a career failure.Comment
-
The reason you can't explain it, is because it doesn't exist.
Please re-read this quote from the OP-ED piece you linked to:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-ron-paul.html
Do you understand what, "Unless major changes are made today" means? Let me try re-phrasing it for you: It means that we DON'T have to default...IF we make major changes now. He says the same thing in the video, so there is no flip flop.Unless major changes are made today, the U.S. will default on its debt sooner or later, and it is certainly preferable that it be sooner rather than later.
The reason you never heard back from me, is because you never asked me the question. I don't believe anyone can know 100% what the consequences of a default will be. Where did I make such a ridiculous statement?
I never said the video was an op-ed piece. I assumed you would understand I was referring to the Bloomberg OP-ED piece. I then proceeded to post a quote from it where he also states that there is no need to default. Remember that quote? Did you even read it?
Last edited by acrylix; 07-29-2011, 09:08 AM.Comment
-
no.The reason you can't explain it, is because it doesn't exist.
Please re-read this quote from the OP-ED piece you linked to:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-ron-paul.html
Do you understand what, "Unless major changes are made" means? Let me try re-phrasing it for you: It means that we DON'T have to default. He says the same thing in the video, so there is no flip flop.
The reason you never heard back from me, is because you never asked me the question. I don't believe anyone can know 100% what the consequences of a default will be. Where did I make such a ridiculous statement?
I never said the video was an op-ed piece. I assumed you would understand I was referring to the Bloomberg OP-ED piece. I then proceeded to post a quote from it where he also states that there is no need to default. Remember that quote? Did you even read it?
let's start at the beginning since that's where you lack understanding. the op-ed piece is written by ron paul. that includes the title, which is verbatim:
moreover, your quoting his *it's not too late* shenanigans simply reinforces my point that ron paul is clueless. yeah, let's do the following by midnight monday.Default Now, or Suffer a More Expensive Crisis Later: Ron Paul
By Ron Paul
from the "op-ed" piece.It isn?t too late to return to fiscal sanity. We could start by canceling out the debt held by the Federal Reserve, which would clear $1.6 trillion under the debt ceiling. Or we could cut trillions of dollars in spending by bringing our troops home from overseas, making gradual reforms to Social Security and Medicare, and bringing the federal government back within the limits envisioned by the Constitution. Yet no one is willing to step up to the plate and make the hard decisions that are necessary. Everyone wants to kick the can down the road and believe that deficit spending can continue unabated.Comment
-
i know there are several people reading this thread laughing their asses off at this ridiculous comment
keep dancing, shitstain. although i've already gotten bored rubbing your shitstained nose in your own shit time and again every time all the time any timeComment
-
"look at me in dyna homo!
i use more smilies! it makes me seem funnier!
look at me go!
check out my abs!
hey guys take off your shirts!
hey female affiliate reps i own no sites but im going to hit on you anyway
did someone mention nutrition? dont worry fellas dyna homo has arrived!
more smilies:
"Comment
-
keep dancing shitstain. all the time, every time.Comment
-
I'm afraid the one lacking understanding is you. In fact, I think you've just proven that you hadn't even bothered to read past the title of the op-ed piece before starting this thread and making a fool out of yourself.
He clearly states in the piece that we don't have to default. But, if we can't change today, we will have no choice but to do just that. He then goes on to state that it would be better to default now than later...which he states in the title as well.
Whether you agree with what he says or not, there was no flip flop between that piece and the video interview.
Get your facts straight next time.Comment
-
typical ron paul attitude, make it about the messenger or anything other than the actual facts that are presented.I'm afraid the one lacking understanding is you. In fact, I think you've just proven that you hadn't even bothered to read past the title of the op-ed piece before starting this thread and making a fool out of yourself.
He clearly states in the piece that we don't have to default. But, if we can't change today, we will have no choice but to do just that. He then goes on to state that it would be better to default now than later...which he states in the title as well.
Whether you agree with what he says or not, there was no flip flop between that piece and the video interview.
Get your facts straight next time.
fact is, he wrote that op-ed piece, then when he was challenged on it in the interview and backed down.
as i said earlier, you ron paulies can believe what you want, i'm confident enough in my own views that i don't feel the need to denigrate someone else simply because they view things different than i do.
the fact that you feel the need to do so says much more about you than it does me.Comment
-
ron paul, a member of congress, states that "they" (the congress) will just keep printing money so no need to default.
gotta love the double-speak.Comment
Comment