2257 Changes: In Case You Don't Know, No You Know

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • JD
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Sep 2003
    • 22651
    #51
    Hire me for all your blog design needs!!

    50

      Comment

      • crockett
        in a van by the river
        • May 2003
        • 76818
        #52
        Originally posted by Kingfish
        That isn’t entirely true. As I read it, they want a multi-factor test, and one of those factors is it a picture of the pubic area. Thus, if the image is above the waist you could even use bare breasted pictures.
        I'm guessing you didn't read the entire thing.. what is posted in this thread's first post, is just a very small part of the updates. I'd suggest you read the entire thing.
        In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

          Comment

          • xxxjay
            Tube groupie.
            • Aug 2002
            • 13482
            #53
            Originally posted by crockett
            I'm guessing you didn't read the entire thing.. what is posted in this thread's first post, is just a very small part of the updates. I'd suggest you read the entire thing.
            Those are the bullet points.
            http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

              Comment

              • Kingfish
                Confirmed User
                • Sep 2002
                • 668
                #54
                Originally posted by crockett
                I'm guessing you didn't read the entire thing.. what is posted in this thread's first post, is just a very small part of the updates. I'd suggest you read the entire thing.
                I already read through it and the only correction I need to make is that I meant to use the word depiction not picture.
                See:
                http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...f/E7-13500.pdf
                Above the waist depictions are fine no matter how arousing. Just keep in make sure you don?t run afoul of the other existing definitions of sexually explicit already in 2256. In the Federal register they say what they want the test to determine if a depiction is a lascivious display of the pubic area vs. a non lascivious display. It makes more since if you read the Federal Register yourself because no matter how well someone else explains it they leave something out and it creates misunderstandings.

                  Comment

                  • StickyGreen
                    .
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 13076
                    #55
                    crockett, don't you only need 2257 docs for content on your own host? Why would you need docs for the sponsor's hosted galleries? That makes no sense at all. If the images on your site are not sexually-explicit then you don't need any records. When the surfer clicks the non-explicit thumb, they get the FHG, which is on the sponsor's host... therefore they are responsible for the 2257 docs.
                    Refer Cam Girls and Take Home 10% of Everything They Make For Life

                      Comment

                      • V_RocKs
                        Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 32451
                        #56
                        Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude


                        ADG
                        Damn! A Player!

                          Comment

                          • Naja-ram
                            Confirmed User
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 639
                            #57
                            Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
                            btw there is one big OUT to 2257..


                            these new regs can be removed if we industry can prove a certain amount of cost this would cause to the american economy

                            because this would effect a HUGE portion of the net not just porn. this will effect all american hosting companies and domain registrars , severely affecting their ability to compete in a global market.. this will affect billing companies the same way add onto that the cost each site will have to spend to document every image/video will be HUGE $$$
                            how will this affect hosting and domain registration companies ?
                            http://www.muslimmatrimonial.com/

                              Comment

                              • Naja-ram
                                Confirmed User
                                • Aug 2006
                                • 639
                                #58
                                Originally posted by Juilan
                                ok so fine artists and fine art photographers are not FCC regulated, they don't qualify for the "Hollywood Pass" so they will by hit by 2257 as well.

                                In the event one is targeted, I would imagine the ACLU fights it out and we get our first new case law that way.

                                america is going to be worse than Iran was I'll tallya that HAHA!
                                http://www.muslimmatrimonial.com/

                                  Comment

                                  Previous 1 2 template Next
                                  Working...