Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth
I don't know anything about photography and I have no beef with Paul Markham and I generally don't go around trolling, but all I can say is if I had to choose between a Sears catalogue and those photos posted above as jack-off material, I would choose the Sears catalogue. Those photos aren't attractive at all.
|
They were great for the time. the quality of the images is down to being shot on negatives which are now around 20 years old.
As a shooter who sold to an area in porn that few other online porn shooters could. What does that say about the rest?
Honest question. When so many custom shooters were working for $300 a scene they sold out right, why do you think none sold to magazines? Make a real honest reply, because if I was good enough, they weren't in some way.