Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink
Paul please don't talk about "crap" content then post those hideously composed and poor quality examples of yours. Any hate for you was well earned on your part.
.
|
Those samples were shot 25 years ago on negative film. For the time it was great, for today it's not so great. But instead of ignoring advice from better shooters, I listened and learned.
The stuff online porn people were selling back in 2000 was either crap or the shooters were clueless businessmen. Because there were markets that would of made their content production side free or even profitable before it got to a paysite. They weren't good enough or they wouldn't of been filling sites with content that was paying them shit money. Money we refused.
Truth was they WERE NOT GOOD ENOUGH and most still aren't when it comes to shooting sets. As for videos, well the consumer is the best judge of that. Members ares are clearly not good enough in todays market. They can't compete with a Tube full poor quality resolution streamed video.
When someone can give away a product for free, that you're trying to sell, and the consumers prefer it. Then the product isn't good enough.
porno jew I was telling people 10 years ago where this industry was headed. I saw it happen to offline, I knew filling sites with crap content and spending a fortune to get people to look at free porn was fucked up. So not that clueless.
You're not even bright enough to realise I'm not a photographer, even though I've said it a 1,000 times. I'm a pornographer and businessman.
I just compare the signatures of the haters with mine to see who has a clue. Why do so few of you have anything of any worth in your sigs?
http://www.caseyanthonypics.com/ PJ is that the best you can do?
