I find myself more interested in the Reggie mockumentary to be honest.
It's harder to shoot porn today than it was back in the old days.
Collapse
X
-
-
Has the review been posted and I am just not locating it?When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
this is like Christmas Day his birthday all rolled into one for Damian - he's drooling in anticipation
I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!Comment
-
It really doesn't matter. He's broke and lives in a rented one bed flat. So with all his "skills" they have brought him little.
I'm happily retired and for decades sold to a section of the porn industry that out paid what custom shooters got paid often by a factor of 10. AND still own all the content. A section of the industry few other custom shooters could get into. So were left with what online paid.
In business it's all about the money, not who is the best if the best is broke.
The only thing many can throw at me is that I'm broke. Which is Damian's whole arsenal. Well he like everyone else is clueless on that.
The quality might not be top notch, I'm 3 years out of the game and no where near the fitness I used to be. It's the actual porn structure and way I got the girl to perform that matters here. Can a fully fit, experienced and regular working skilled shooter take my ideas and use them to achieve a better job?
Yes, yes, yes and yes.
Can he do it for $3,000 a scene?
Yes, yes, yes and yes.
Can he do it for $300 to $700 a scene?
Well it seems the answer is no.Comment
-
Thanks for replying to me a few days ago.
Will it be released so these guys can see it?
As for quality, is that the quality of the image on the video or the structure of the film, performance of the model, the way I captured her (in framing, angles, emotion, etc) or just the porn quality?
IMO too many sites today lack any personality. The models come in, go through their act and go home. The emotion level is low and often faked. What I tried to do was make Sandra real and give the viewer an insight into who she was. Not just shoot another scene of another porn girl going through another days work.
I hope the scene achieve that?Comment
-
Page 27. So glad this thread got so far.
Comment
-
Proud of 27 pages of you doing your best to make yourself look like an idiot?↑ see post ↑
13101Comment
-
Comment
-
No time for modesty, your video can't be worse than those BRAZZERs videos about teaching.... all jak jak jak...
I saw on the camera it was far in advance of what they have on the Mofos site. IMO
It had more purpose, the connection between me and Sandra was far better than Mofos shooters get, also it wasn't just another girl on another sofa type content.
The stills also were far in advance of what most sites have, range of poses, number of images, covering all the positions. But this is to be expected as I was selling to magazines and that's a tough market.
Why it hasn't been shown is a mystery. If it was crap I'm pretty sure Fabian would love to put it up. If it had any real flaws also it would of gone up. However if it was good, would it put Fabian in a position of having to do something about Mofos content?Comment
-
Arsewithclass has models who claim he wont pay them. Read his pathetic excuse here http://www.gfy.com/showpost.php?p=17...&postcount=102Comment
-
To be very honest I'm not sure about the quality of the image. I was wrong in not taking a monitor and the video camera was new to me.
What I tried to do was bring out the reality and emotion of the scene.
As Reggie will testify I'm a long way from being fully fit and physically functioning. The idea of being a full time shooter again for any money is now out of my head. I shot this as much to see where I was in my recovery ans whether I could achieve the same porn quality as I used to.
I think I achieved it. Could I of done better image quality, with a better camera, monitor, over head mike? Yes. Could I of achieved a better porn quality with all that?
Well it never was about the quality of your equipment. And always about how you use it.
Comment




Comment