View Single Post
Old 06-20-2011, 08:02 AM  
Pseudonymous
Photographer/Owner
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt View Post
Bailey rebills for me better than 90% of solo girl sites. Misty Gates too. Their multi model site is poor.

I haven't been following their update schedule - hmm, doesn't look like Brooke Marks has updated in awhile.

I do know that Bailey, Misty and Brooke do their camshows for members weekly.

A lot of solo girl site programs with college aged girls do seem to have problems with having enough content to keep to update schedules - because most girls don't live in the same places as their photographer/webmaster and they fall behind before they can get new shoots done. Models in that age group are not the easiest to schedule.
I still find it hard to believe, even though you've told me that before. As I mentioned last time, nowhere on the site does it state it's a nonnude site. I couldn't imagine how many surfers that'd piss off. Alot of the NN designs aren't really different in any sense, so i dont understand how the member isn't lead to believe theres more inside, as there is with every other website.

Ill still put money on the fact NN sites don't make as much as nude solo girl sites. Maybe Bailey Knox is semi close because she's gorgeous. One of the top in the solo niche for sure, as far as looks goes.

And if youre so confident in the fact that they rebill so well, lol why don't you hire a NN girl ;) lol i know you wouldn't

Last edited by Pseudonymous; 06-20-2011 at 08:07 AM..
Pseudonymous is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote